Ah I see now you were talking about the post rewards of this post, not @ocdb.
I was wrong. See? I admitted it again.
Anyway this is bringing a lot of value to Hive so naturally people want to reward the effort that went behind it. It's not like @lordbutterfly is farming post rewards daily or posting stupid shit.
Yep. Just an example being given - not trying to say anything one way or the other about the project, the post, or anyone behind the project.
I tagged the folks I did because they're all folks who say that "over-rewarded" is the reason for censorship - even though it falls wildly disproportionately onto very specific communities & content, who are almost never on trending, and who are doing in-depth research, actual journalism, etc.
Never claimed that - especially not about butterfly, who kicks ass!
Notice that I've never made judgemental statements about your content, azir's content, etc. Also, never made an attacks or judgments about the things any of you have done on the platform - outside the very specific example of malicious downvoting for censorship of non-corporate narratives, and the general problem of centralization on this chain.
Curangel is one project with delegated stake from others. You can't call it centralized when there's many other projects with way more stake and even users with way more personal stake. You've been downvoted from 3-4 different "whales" who many probably had their own reasons to, I doubt whoever altleft is has been conspiring against zero'ing your rewards together with curangel and smooth, he surely hasn't contacted me about it and neither have the others. Similarly to their downvotes there's also a ton of overrewarded votes from the same "centralization" you talk about, i.e. one voter with a big delegation (jamesc-tribesteemup) or xeldal's trail do the same thing but the opposite way. Somehow that's fine but when it's downvotes it instantly means the system is centralized? come on.