These messages are from May, but you seem to be missing the bigger picture here. If an individual is collecting donations, running for president, and claims to be a Voluntaryist, don’t you think it appropriate to expose said individual/s when his campaign strategist is has hired high profile hackers to destroy someone’s life, and has even hinted at attempts to physically harass the victim and potentially his family?
Don’t you think taking action is appropriate even when the aggressor is just a “normal guy,” as well? If not, why not?
“Cooling down” doesn’t change that.
Thanks for commenting, I guess.
Oh no, you missunderstand. I said what i said to ease your mind a bit. This is shitty, if true, in every way, but as i said this was in May and it doesnt seem anything happened so far, so maybe it was all in the spur of the moment.
Its still a good thing you came out with this. When more people know about this then you take away his power to act even if he wanted to.
Gotcha. Thanks for clarifying.