Not sure if I understood:
If they don't accommodate decentralization they can't achieve global technocratic totalitarian tyranny, oddly enough. Imperial polities like the EU and the US need to follow in the footsteps of the USSR, IMHO.
Can you explain? Do you mean we have to hit the ground hard before we can leave La-La-Land? I would agree, I am afraid.
Yes, AfD is the option which will maybe get things changed. There is a need for new kids on the block. They first have to deliver though, and I would be curious if they could. At least, give it a chance. All else means non governing and being over rolled by reality, as McGregor puts it.
If a big gang wants to take over a new neighborhood, but there's some smaller gangs already holding that turf, the big gang must first get the smaller gangs out of the way. If one of the smaller gangs refuses to be folded into the larger gang, but can't be taken out by violence easily either, then the big gang can either give up, or turn to harder violence. What they cannot do is succeed at taking the new turf with that smaller gang in place.
The NWO is taking over the world. The US and EU need to either be absorbed into the NWO, or destroyed, for that to happen. Several states member in the EU, such as Hungary and Slovakia, are quite intent on resisting certain of the EU's policies, such as unrestrained immigration. The AfD's stated policy is against such immigration. Poland's PiS also has a strong anti-immigration streak, as do others. These Eastern bloc polities may well break the EU, but if not will make it considerably easier to break, with their concerted policies, and this will make the NWO's job easier, because a weaker EU will be an easier EU to absorb or destroy.
I see.
It is correct what you say, if you think in friend and foe patterns and make the world a map and its peoples its figures.
For my part, I do neither believe in a world order, nor in a new world order, since the world cannot be ordered by central means for an indefinite time, it's too big of a chunk. Though I do think that there are always forces at work which want control and those who want to resist such control. If resistance shall be neutralized, eliminated, destroyed, you must erase all of it, otherwise it will come back in one form or the other. Since this cannot be achieved in the long run, because if you kill or harm resisting individuals or groups, you produce at the same time their successors who want to take up the baton.
Which doesn't mean that you or I won't be negatively affected or that our children will be part of a resistance.
The place that each of us occupies, the influence that we as individuals exert on others, may be small and insignificant in comparison, but that is what matters nonetheless.
I do believe there is an serious effort to create a global technocratic totalitarian tyranny, and that it's principals are not capable of suitable reticence, despite their competence to aggrandize themselves. My understanding of the brutal banksters is that they have succeeded in the extant order of the world, which does exist with shortcomings notwithstanding, because of pathological features of their neurological functioning, that has made them capable of committing atrocities healthy people are incapable of.
I agree with you that they cannot succeed, perhaps for somewhat differing reasons.
Our parts we play in what is to come are all we can effect, and you are also correct that this is what we must attend to.