No that is not actually correct. It is normally because there is no good evidence to back up such treatments. If there was they would be used.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
No that is not actually correct. It is normally because there is no good evidence to back up such treatments. If there was they would be used.
They have ignored the evidence because these herbals are not being done in a lab.
That is completely untrue. Good evidence often doesn't exist.
For thousands of years the Chinese have documented it as well as other cultures that use it with results, please point out where you see evidence in western society where their work is shared.
That is not science. Either it has peer reviewed research to back it or it is just hearsay. Anyway this is a pointless argument. Let's end it here.
I doubt that. I think they ignore it because of the Semmelweiss effect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis
Not really it is quite the opposite.