You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Reward Pool Rape: Why The Whale Wars Might Be Far From Ending

in #news7 years ago (edited)

For me, I've been watching with rapt attention and unseen awe how the platform has been evolving, with some people really getting it big, even when the quality of their posts is not that awesome, but that's by the way... Because there must always be the rich(who works very little and earn more) and the poor(who often appear to be working hard and yet get very little).

It's a matter of social status and it's obtainable in our society, so I have to accept that.

Meanwhile, I suggest that there should be a limit of posts for a day (3 posts).

Also, @ned should fix a limit to the amount of SBD an account can earn in a post (500 SBD) should be the limit, the subsequent gains on the post should should then be shared equally to the accounts that upvoted the post.

Another problem I have noticed on the platform, is that most Curators are not being checked, they barely curate posts and yet they are being paid from it, this too should be looked into.

Also dormant accounts with excess STEEM Power should experience 5% deduction of their SP for not posting or commenting for 5months.

These are my submissions.
It could be edited and remoulded into a great idea.

Sort:  

Wow , very good suggestions indeed . However I indicated most of it in my former posts and people rejected it because of the platform being uncensored and people can always open multiple accounts however doing nothing is no solution

@idunique
best part of this comment is dormant accounts with large steem power should experience 5% deduction. well, very good but it will not work as they are the big boys. well, lets hope for the best.

Very true, because those who possess the power seems to control the platform.

No need to do something as massive as 5%, that would scare away investors of all kinds. But the current way authorship is required as an excuse to direct the reward pool to oneself is obviously broken. Most large investors have better things to do with their time to write blog posts all day.

lol yeah the way curation works it you have to look more at the number of votes and how old the post is than any of the content itself. I at least don't upvote obvious spam, to my knowledge.

But unless you pay to win, or kiss the butt of whales even if they are propaganda accounts, no one sees anything on here.