people are pissed at Elon now and for what
I'm pissed at him, and Trump, for rushing in the technocracy. I think that will prove to be a large part of DOGE's function.
All you need to know to predict the ending is is what publication it is in.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think you speak in jest but I'm trying to understand it. I think having experts be in charge of something is fine, but I am also apprehensive. How about all those "experts" ruining the world during Covid? that was fun.
This is why I do not trust Donald Trump. A corbett report that discusses my fears of technocracy's being the real agenda of his administration.
vigilante TV... does that come from that anarchist / libertarian dude that lives in Mexico? If so I enjoyed quite a bit of his stuff.
answered my own question: Jeff something is his name and yes, it is his website. Thanks for pointing that out because I didn't really know where to find that guy these days.
Yes, Jeff Berwick. I have followed him for years. He's been right about a lot of things in the past ten years, but I sure hope he's wrong about some of what is coming. His videos are on Hive, under the tdvtv account.
Not in jest,no. I'm not sure which part you think is in jest either.
By this I meant that,if you read the NYTimes (for example), you know where they are going with any article, because they always end up in the same places, hoping to convince the reader of one of a very few things they want us to believe. Such as Trump is the new Hitler, "transgender" people are not mentally disturbed (they just need medical treatment), and leaders of countries that have lots of resources the US wants are all tyrants who need to be overthrown to protect democracy. There are others, many others, that all lead the reader to have a very narrow understanding of reality, an understanding that conforms to Democrat party platform. The reporting on the covid con is an excellent example
Trust the science! We know best! Then they let data gathered via little plastic trinkets made god-knows-where-and-by-whom, in a big rush, shipped overseas willy nilly, and administered by untrained persons... OK my sentence is getting too long to understand here. The point is that "experts" used unreliable data and hypothetical reasoning to make public policy. This was not science, and the experts were folks with an agenda that was not public health but rather public terror. It worked. We must not let them do that to us again.