You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: You want "free speech"? Go write in a diary!

in #notentitledtoshit5 years ago (edited)

Actually, people seem to have a big misunderstanding of what “downvotes” are designed for.

5A9C4C09-FF7B-4E12-AA00-0BAC340ED037.jpeg

This is a reward based platform and downvotes are a way to regulate those rewards, using ones stake.

Trolling is a valid reason to receive a downvote, so is disagreement with rewards received. Downvotes can also be used as a way to help fight plagiarism as well as fight reward “farming.” Each can use theirs the way they see fit and by downvoting something, it’s returning those rewards to the pool to be distributed to everyone else.

Unfortunately they are not used responsibly by most and then others seem to rage when they receive one.. so yeah, things could be better.

There is also this mute button that works to not “see” people, as well as not visiting their blog. Plus, the upcoming communities feature should help with this quite a bit.

Sort:  

Trolling is a valid use for it

Haha. Let's take a good look at this logic so it is clear why it is stupid:

You're interpreting the list in a way that "if you want to be an internet troll, then you should downvote and that is acceptable."

So let's replace this reason with something else from the list. "If you want to be a plagiarizer, then you should downvote and that is acceptable." See? That's stupid.

Now let me guess: "but this is how I see it." No, it's selfish abuse. By logic, taking a personal interpretation and turning it into "the only thing that is true" defaults to being an asshole. If you enforce it, it's tyranny. That's all there is to it.

"But it's my stake and I can be a tyrant in any way I want!" Well, that's a whole different story. And yes. We understand you can.

I’m not even sure who you are talking to, the English words up there that I wrote state that trolling was a valid reason to receive a downvote or flag.

As in, if you are an internet troll.. someone is fully within their rights (per the whole idea behind the downvote feature) to use their downvotes (and stake) on you.

It seems you and @klevn both took that as me saying it meant trolling is what you should do? 🤔 I’d apologize for any confusion, but I don’t see how there was any.

I understand you now and I apologize. I must say it did seem like you were stating the opposite.

Fair enough, it may be due to my rambling style of writing. In that case, I apologize for the confusion 🙂

I changed the wording a bit to help reflect what I was trying to say more clearly.

Trolling is a valid use for it

trolling is not a valid use for it.

disagreement on rewards
fraud/plagiarism
hate speech or trolling
spam

seems to be very clearly saying to flag trolls.. not be a troll.