The well detailed reponses with sources given by steemcleaners on these posts are clear.
You, self evidently, copied and pasted content from books and researches that you have not written.
Using psychological projection and denialism is not going to change the facts.
Neither will use of red herring (" I have seen more then my share of nonsensical trash posts which is written clearly with zero to little care in terms of content").
The fact that there might be some users posting low quality content or abuse is not justification of your behaviour.
Any user that is caught by steemclenaers abusing Steemit community is dealt with promptly.
Sorry "some users" is an understatement. Just hit the refresh for the new section to get the truth. By far the vast majority of content on this platform is useless drivel with zero quality or care in terms of fostering a better more informative platform in comparison to Facebook ..etc It is ironic verification would require linkage to a competitive but more popular platform. As if Facebook or Twitter for that matter offer anything different or secure in terms of actual ID verification. I also see that you are quick to deride my behavior which is in defense of my content and posts while not accounting for your own, continually posting on my articles cut and paste responses which have zero to do with the actual article. This article for instance. Indeed, even AFTER your beloved Steemcleaners acknowledged and thanked me for complying with the verification of authorship which I have done. Not too mention all of my recent articles have gone through stringent filtering in an effort to comply so why the hate Robbie 2.0? Hmmmm, maybe I should craft some articles on Thai street food such as the less then spicy Tom Kha Kai or perhaps a few out of focus shots of the sunset over the lower east side. Maybe link it as a color challenge which would gain me more favor with the steemit Gods and the mass of less then literate users .