@themevlog In my reply, I never mention the word rapist, I think you need to re-read my reply because I don't think you comprehended my position at all. Name calling to make yourself feel superior and support your side of the argument demonstrates the flaws in your character as well as your argument's.
Good Day.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
you may not have said the word "rapist" but when you tried to correlate his character to him being drunk you might as well call him a rapist. Isn't question of character what led to the claim of rape? I am sorry for name calling but I just can't comprehend how obtuse a person can be to correlate a person's character with something that he did back in college(over 35 years ago). I mean who didn't have a drink or two back in college??? Are you "Mr. Perfect"??? And don't tell me because he's being appointed the highest Judiciary position he needs to be perfect because "NO ONE" IS. I comprehend what you said just fine, it's more of the same thing as calling him a rapist. Again, I didn't mean to sound like I was attacking but rather I was really just shocked and mortified how stupid a person can be.
First of all, he would be considered an alcoholic, even if he doesn't drink anymore, which he clearly still does by his own words. Secondly, you fail to comprehend what I have clearly stated, and that is that Kavanaugh's character, when under scrutiny, be it justified or not, showed some of his true character. He showed defiance and worse, insolence towards some members of the Senate. A person who is supposed to be impartial during such proceedings clearly was not; and that is the only person who should be impartial under such hearings, and that is Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
The problem @themevlog isn't whether he had a few beers or not. The problem isn't that he was a fucking party animal in College, which is cool too. The problem, which seems to dense for you to comprehend, is that he denied being a party animal in college.
Yes, this arose from other accusations/allegations which led to further scrutiny, whether warranted or not, into Brett Kavanaugh's overall character. Kavanaugh tried to sugar coat his party days at Yale, and that is where the problem lies, not on whether he did assault Dr. Ford or not.
He should have been more forth coming and less combative, because you are correct @themevlog No One is Perfect, and Kavanaugh would have been perceived as more open and truthful had he owned more of his party days, rather to attempt to pass it of as good ole' boys drinking and fishing, which clearly it was not.
Based on the evidence, in Kavanaugh's own calendar, and other circumstantial evidence that has come out... Kavanaugh was a party frat boy going to college frat parties doing college frat party things. I don't know if you have gone to college or not, but I actually in my shockingly and mortifying stupidity actually went to a University, and understand exactly what type of life and activities Kavanaugh and his Yale college buddies would have participated in while in school. This doesn't make me or Kavanaugh guilty of anything, but again, he should have been more forth coming about it, and had a better demeanor rather that lashing out in defiance.
And as a side note, I have actually seen lives affected by cases due to excessive college partying, and leading to such situations of sexual assault accusations. In my time and Kavanaugh's time, being drunk as an excuse was more accepted than it is today, therefore assault perpetrators typically got away with it a lot more than they do today.
Im actually very surprised that you went to college. Dont they teach you about logic and reasoning in any of the courses that you took? You seem to have a way of putting things out of context and you make assumptions about things that arent even related. Based on what I see from your previous comments about you being unbiased or non partisan, you can throw that out of the window. In your own words, youve just said you know lives that had been affected due to crazy drunk paries which would indicate you carry some prejudgement in this case.
You took things out of context claiming Kavanaugh is dishonest because he was dishonest about his college drunk parties. Kavanaugh never denied that he had some wild parties back in the day and also admitted to having a beer or two like most Americans. The libtards are taking things out of context by making false accusations about his yearbook suggested that he was some sort of party animal and of course party animals always rape. How about making connection with the fact that he kept a detail diary for many years and could disapprove Dr. FORD'S CLAIMS BUT DR FORD CONVENIENTLY DOESNT REMEMBER WHO DROVE HER HOME AND WHEN AND WHERE IT HAPPENED. I wont get into the many discrepancies on dr fords testimony because im sure you have access to the videos on yourube. Also, im going to tweak your brain a little just for the sake of humanity or anyone else that you may encounter in the future. ...
JUST BECAUDE YOU WENT TO A UNIVERSITY IT DOESNT AUTOMATICALLY MAKE YOU LOGICAL AND REASONABLE AS YOU PROVED YOURSELF HERE. I TOO WENT TO COLLEGE BUT NO NEED TO ADVERTISE.
@themevlog You are extremely prejudiced and judgmental ... your opening statement clearly demonstrates. You incorrectly state "Im actually very surprised you went to college." Incorrectly, because I'm has an apostrophe.
Why should you be surprised, you don't even know me. You claim to be surprised because I express a different point of view than yours, and that would therefore equate to being uneducated or in this case a surprise that I am educated?
Well at least you've deferred from name calling in your arguments in order to instill a sense of superiority for yourself.
And for the final time, this is not about whether Kavanaugh assaulted Dr. Ford or not, it is about whether his character merits to be on the Supreme Court Bench, and yes, your past counts for such positions, even high school acts.
Why do you think Federal Agencies vet people all the way to grade school even?
And just because I have seen situations like this, how would you know which side I was on, the victim or the accused? I never stated so. I simply stated that I have seen people affected by these types of situations.
I never listened to Dr. Ford's testimony, I only listened to Brett Kavanaugh, and in the end, my honest opinion of him is that he is a white privileged little bitch that when he doesn't get his way will snarl and the fangs come out.....in the end, HE LOST HIS COOL..... somehow, you end your last reply addressing it to me when I will never ever be Supreme Court Justice... when in the end this is what it is all about, not about me.
I think you lost your cool @themevlog just like Kavanaugh. Too funny!!!
I am willing to entertain all different points of view only if it makes logical sense, but yours doesn't. How can you come to the conclusion that Kavanaugh is guilty when you haven't even heard Dr. Ford's testimony?Y ou liberals are full of contradictions and lack common sense. Logic to liberals has no meaning, can't have a reasonable intelligent convo without common sense and logic so I will recuse myself from this road to nowhere.