Sort:  

Do you mean that the content is monetised without the knowledge of the member of the crew who created it?

Do you mean that @hivewatchers has a problem with linking relevant Youtube videos (with attribution) as a small part of a broader post? This is acceptable use under copyright law and normal behaviour on Hive.

No, copying and pasting (spamming copypasta) someone's content without permission from the author for monetisation has always been frowned upon by the community (except abusers and abuse enablers). It has been like this since 2016. The Hive ecosystem is not Facebook.
Considering your response on behalf of this account, I suspect now that you have something to do with it (own it?)

The "previous owner" was never mentioned. The mention was edited after.
The blog had been expressing itself as if it were the owner of all those videos and footage and personally took part in all these past events.

Screenshot 2025-07-22 at 12.59.43.png

This account will be blacklisted now.

The owner of this account is a ship and it DID personally take part in these events as is clear from the video itself. Ships have legal personality.

SV Sea Explorer is perfectly entitled to use this video taken of it by its previous owner.

This is not abuse.

YOU are engaging in abuse.

You are WAY beyond your remit, are ignorant of the law and your high handed attitude has pushed away many good users.

This is utter rubbish. It is standard practice on Hive to include links to YouTube videos of 3rd party content relevant to your post.

Have a look at the large majority of posts for Three Tune Tuesday as just one example.

https://peakd.com/trending/threetunetuesday

Actually the intellectual property related to Sea Explorer would likely have transferred to the new owner with the sale of Sea Explorer.

Misleading information.

When buying a yacht/boat/ship, intellectual property rights like design, technology, or other creative elements do not automatically transfer to the buyer. While the buyer acquires ownership of the physical yacht itself, the designer or creator typically retains the intellectual property rights.

You know nothing about the contractual arrangements between buyer and seller of a ship and nor are you entitled to. Transfer of intellectual property rights in relation to a ship is quite normal.

You are taking a guilty until proven innocent approach that is defamatory and misleading and deceptive in breach of multiple laws.