|▶️Watch On Odysee |▶️ Watch On Library
House subcommittee on Sars2.0 holds hearing on ending pandemic.
Fauci evades questions like a politician and justifies the draconian measures by appealing to public safety.
ALL SOCIALS | https://linktr.ee/krishool
🧠PEAKD: https://peakd.com/@krishool
▶️ YOUTUBE MUSIC https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz6-V2uPiOaeSqQv0ePoTQg
▶️ YOUTUBE TKJ PODCAST https://www.youtube.com/TheKrishoolJourneyTV
🔥 TELEGRAM https://t.me/thekrishooljourney
♣️ PARLOUR https://parler.com/profile/officialkrishool/posts
📚 LIBRARY.TV https://lbry.tv/@esotericnoetic:1
🎧 iTunes : http://hyperurl.co/5xzgy4
🐤TWITTER: http://hyperurl.co/bbd4kl
👱♂️INSTAGRAM: http://hyperurl.co/zk5eh0
What does this have to do with veganism ?
The heart of Veganism is Ahimsa: Non-violence to all sentient beings.
Advocating to force mask and vaccinate people is not only immoral but considering many of the ingredients within vaccines are animal-based that also makes it Unvegan ;)
No that is incorrect! while many of us have expanded on the philosophy it has nothing to do with humans at all or non violence toward humans. Veganism is a philosophy based solely in animals rights and non violence where possible (meaning if you have to defend yourself from a lion trying to eat you it is allowed because the exact statement of the vegan society is where possible ). The mask mandate is not violence, not wearing one is- it is selfish and just the usual human me first attitude. It would not have to be enforced if humans were not so shit in the first place - also no one is forcing anyone to get the vaccine that would be immoral and yes a violation of rights - however if you chose not to get one you also have to accept that their might be places you are not welcome and be a grownup about it. As for vaccines being vegan you are right most are not - from ingredients to testing its pretty horrid ...
Humans by scientific definition are an animal so violence towards humans is still considered non-vegan.
The idea that not wearing a mask is violent is disingenuous. That's an appeal to potentiality fallacy. Violence involves the initiation of force, fraud, or consent in Common Law (Actual Human Rights) not the potential for an outcome.
The idea that you or a government has the right to force an individual to comply with any mandate when they are being peaceful is directly in violation of their Human Rights.
Moreover, vaccines are as a matter of fact being imposed on individuals in Australia and abroad through coercive measures
i.e restricting access to public facilities, interstate/OS travel and more. Mask mandates, along with Vaccine mandates, violate the Human Rights Charter, Nuremberg Code Unesco Treaty, and very much unequivocally violate the rights of an individual.
--While humans are technically animals veganism as is was originally conceptualised made very sure to say non human animals - you can't just make up things because you wish it to be. Read up on the beginnings of the vegan society.
And violence does not always physical force the focus is harm as there is also such a thing as verbal violence . A mask does not 100% protect the wearer depending on the model it might only help 60% , but it does protect others from the virus in significantly higher numbers. It has to do with protecting people from your potential infection. This is why the Japanese do it the minute they feel sick , this is why the normal flue and common cold numbers have dropped significantly since covid - because of the damn mask!
So yes if you run around not wanting to wear a mask in a public place knowing you can potentially kill people it is violence and a at of a selfish asshat. You are not being peaceful if you are bringing in a pathogen on purpose that is an act of recklessness and if you contaminate someone a deliberate act of violence .
You can't see it because it does not fit you covid conspiracy narrative. But think of this for a moment , if someone contaminated themselves with a highly contagious bio weapon and deliberately walk in public places to spread it how would you feel about it ? I
As for you violation of rights theory it is simple your rights end at the the minute you breach the skin or the wellbeing of another. Your right can never entail the rights to potentially kill anther human being it really is as simple as that. You are a prime example of how selfish humans are , this is why non humans will always be slaves to human whims because most are selfish idiots
Exercising one's freedom isn't selfish. Selfishness is forcing other people to sacrifice their freedom in exchange for your idea of security.
Your health isn't my responsibility. My health isn't your responsibility. I own me. You own you. Look up the concept of self-ownership.
The fact of the matter is you wouldn't dare force someone else to wear a mask because you know, intuitively, that that would make YOU the aggressor. Have you ever attempted to force someone else to wear a mask? If you feel so strongly about the issue, perhaps you should consider it. Feel free to record your encounter and post it online. I'd love to see what happens.
p.s. Is the entire population of Sweden 'selfish' for not wearing masks? What do you say to the Swedes? They haven't worn masks or been locked down since the start of the pandemic.
Double p.s. your obedience isn't a virtue. It's a sign of cowardice.
So there is the difference between you and me you are all about you the typical human not caring for shit how they affect others . Unlike you I believe we all have a responsibility toward each other, all life is connected and as such we should at the least try not to harm others . Again it is fine for you not wanting to wear a mask but you also cannot force your way into places and business where they don't want people without masks , you cannot force yourself into public places where the rules are for all . As for Sweden did you see how bad they did number wise- and yes they are selfish and stupid . Your freedom ends at the skin or well bing of another if you become a threat to me do i have the right to defend myself ?
The term Vegan was coined by Donald Watson who asked his readership from the vegetarian society to come up with a term to separate the non-dairy, non-egg-eating vegetarians from the egg and dairy-eating vegetarians. Whereas the definition of Veganism
has overgone changes in its definition by the vegan society, its origins
are from the UK Vegetarian Society and further than the foundation of Veganism are from the Vegetarian society, based on the philosophy of Ahimsa which emphasizes nonviolence towards all sentient beings.
Regardless of what you call yourself or how you define Veganism,
it is objectively immoral to force people to do anything if they are being peaceful.
Verbal violence does not exist. Hate speech is not violence. And the potential for harm is not violence. We are all living in a bubble of potentiality and to make such an argument, denotes a complete and utter disregard for the basic tenants of human rights, is not only unwise and stupid but immoral.
Namaste & peace be upon your butt cheeks my naive and ignorant padawan.
Tell that to the people I know who died of covid - I have the right to be safe from people like you - do you really believe you have the right to harm others ? that your needs and wants supersede that of others who cannot protect themselves from your behaviour ? You are trying to force people to live in danger - you don't want to wear a mask fine stay at home and away from others - you cannot demand entry to places and expect people to let you endanger them. Its the same behaviour and reasoning I get from carnists all the time - the boo hoo about their right to harm others for pleasure- in the no mask case its the right to harm others just because it hurts their feelings SMH
P.s It is also interesting that you negate the validity of verbal abuse - because abuse is violence my dear it cause real damage to sentients and can even affect heath and body
LOL - fragile ego much ? go ahead mute me it does not make what you spew the truth nor your behaviour acceptable. Only the weak minded mute within a debate - you discredited yourself - good riddance