well I think it would have to be slightly adjusted from the current proposal system anyway.... more of a race to the top to keep your job! hehe. Its a pretty horrendous thought....but then so much about society and human nature is horrendous anyway.... I mean imagine getting sacked behind closed doors when you're supposedly working for a DAO?
The question of whether the company have screwed up their investments or taken on too many staff or positioned themselves poorly for the bear market is a head scratcher for sure.... but in my mind, its all just more reason to open up a portion of serious decision making to the DAO. The core team would still get to put the parameters on, like how much of the companys investment can be voted on by the DAO, what the rough wage budget should be after layoffs etc. Then the community gets to weigh in and feel some responsibility for the survival and direction of the company. Obviously long term, you'd want those core team members to be voted in or out as well so that you've always got a senate who are (partially) elected by the people. I don't know.... I guess Im impatient for revolutionary digital governance and maybe its just not quite ready yet....but I see these major turning points as big opportunities to bring the community further onboard and so far this one is being missed