You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Rewards Based on Card Level

in #splinterlands2 years ago

Ijust think old players should not be punished my self and many others have been playing this game for 5 years or more and maybe time should weight into the vote to. Bc we have in most cases invested alot more. Im all about helping ppl get up there and earn but not at cost to my unless i decide to give it which i do alot. But no rule lowering my Ernings or other large investors but have maybe a card wining prize with less money so the deck can advnace. I grinded up in alpha beta i did good took a year or two but that can be devalued totally bc weve been playing a long long time. Need a way to make ppl happy and not lower are rewards if you are considerd a whale bc if the whales go dump everything what will you play - not like i want tht it would be the worst for me i have a bit of it all here lol

Sort:  

If the rental market works " perfect". That would mean easy to use for new people.

Then the changes could make a lot of sense.

Like "top 20" decks for rent or something like that.

If rental market should drop massive, card prices will drop massive short after it, means yields will drop after it too.

I love my rental account too.

But if the yield is "-card value" because of less new players, I'm in favor of a more sustainable model :D

If panic should hit in and we end up in PVP market, it will become dirty.

That's why more players and more hands are better in a more accessible game.

I have no problem holding in a "bera market",but the game needs in the meanwhile the ability to grow in users IMO.

IDK :)

Im in favour of everything that works with one click " rent for cash". No research needed, Player see the price for timeframe x and can purchase or not for different levels for example.

Works best in e-commerce, so why not here :D

I love a working rental market too :)

sure it needs a free market balance.

Another idea would be to let the proposal work and add for a "skill variant" a change of season rewards in the league for top players.

So skill really matter, and even a player with lower $ invested could have a "top player experience".

I maybe look at things a bit differently, because I played a lot of competitive games like starcraft.

 2 years ago  Reveal Comment

Sure,

That's the balance needed to find. But IMO the game is different to a 2k investment 10k investment and more.

Sure nobody needs to have all cards or something like that. Rentals are also cool.

But I think the game sucks for new users.

Another cool thing that could be fun for new users are "shared cards". like someone in a guild allows all members to use the cards and earn 70% of the earned rewards.

For players is "no investment" needed and the most skilled can earn the most.

Something like that would be cool IMO. Simple and easy.