Thank you for this treasury report!

Interesting to see another call from Splinterlands to create additional tools for the DAO. While I think it's great to the community actively involved in enhancing the resources, reporting and tools for the DAO, we should consider that we have already set a precedent with a previous DAO proposal to compensate a third party for work that was "suggested" by Splinterlands (proposal #18, https://peakd.com/@peakmonsters/peakmonsters-create-a-dashboard-to-view-and-interact-with-community-proposal-suggestions)

Are we going to want a DAO vote every time we want to compensate the community for a project that benefits us all? This could get unwieldy and cumbersome, and few organizations can be effective with so many stakeholders that are also decisionmakers. I would like to see the DAO authorize a reasonable budgeted amount per quarter for community projects, and empower a small number of individuals to make decisions below a particular threshold, where larger projects would require a DAO vote.