For me I think the fee structure should remain as is because according to my thinking I don't understand why the third party marketplaces are better than the game market place. That in itself does not sit very well with me. ok they allowed third party sites to take the fees why not make those sites pay a % of the fees they collect to splinterlands? Now you want to make it look like as if it is fair to charge an extra 1% fee to the final consumer when that final consumer is the one paying that fee in the first place. My thinking is if a third party site want to work with splinterlands they are the ones to be charged by splinterlands not the player.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hi, thanks for taking the time to share your opinion. Under this new proposal, what you are describing is exactly what will happen. Traditionally, third party marketplaces paid nothing and got 100% of the earnings. This proposal makes every third party market place (and player) pay an additional 1% fee to the DAO to support the overall economy of the game and company. In the future if the company ever needs additional revenue, they may simply request a grant through the DAO via a proposal.
This proposal splits the 2% royalty to the DAO 50/50 between marketplaces and players to make it "fair", since players and third party markets work hand in hand to deliver a successful game.