You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Revamp Market Fees to Include 2% DAO Royalty

in #spsproposallast year

I will dig deeper. My thoughts were this would create more competition, not less. I'll speak with the 3 major providers and get their thoughts and input. Of course I want competition and I also want a vibrant and healthy 3rd party market, so yes I will.

Sort:  

Please talk to smaller players like MM, cardauctions, splex & layer2lab who are in discounted card sell business.

Also please talk to peripheral services and tools like https://splinterguide.com/ https://www.splintercards.com/ https://bo0mburst.github.io/splinterguilds/

All these services and the small players, many within your own guild will be hurt big time.

Peakmonsters/Jarvie can take a small revenue hit, not only because he is a big provider, but also he get hive DHF funding $600/day! I am not saying he doesn't deserve it. Peak is an excellent tool, and I use it. I am writing this note on Peakd. I am only saying he doesn't care about the small revenue loss, while the others will get decimated.

image.png

https://peakd.com/me/proposals

but also he get hive DHF funding $600/day!

That's a totally different project and focused on building open source products for Hive, not Splinterlands.

PeakMonsters is not open source and not funded by that proposal at all. As everyone on Hive already knows you can easily see how funds from that proposal get used and how many developers are working on those open source projects. And follow their work on GitLab (https://gitlab.com/peakd/).

Yes. But you are still developing PeakD right? You are same human?

Totally humans, with the same limited amount of working hours/day to split across all different projects 😄

And we use funds from the proposal only for hours worked on the open source stuffs. Otherwise this number would be zero:

image.png

Yes. So my point is your living expenses are cared for. Even if from a different source on the mother chain. You deserve it. Well done!

Your competitors can’t say that. They are dependent on this card market revenue stream. Do you understand?

I get your point. You look at this proposal and evaluate how it will impact existing projects. I look at this proposal and I evaluate how it will attract new projects or define future development for 3rd party tools.

They are dependent on this card market revenue stream. Do you understand?

Many of those marketplaces have been around for years and the developers know the ecosystem very very well. I'm pretty sure they will adapt to the new model. It's not something that should be effective starting tomorrow. Elapsed can be defined in terms of weeks/months.

Please talk to smaller players like MM, cardauctions, splex & layer2lab who are in discounted card sell business.

What about a "discounted card listing business" for projects that want to go there?

It's upto the businesses to propose it.

I will definitely do that. I think all the 3rd party services are great. and want them to weigh in. Also not only on this proposal, but how we can deepen and improve our ecosystem.

You are correct, this would create more competition to develop better tools for listing cards instead of only incentivizing making better marketplaces for buying.