Clayop, you don't understand how this works. IF we raise the price of steem by building a free, useful network, where votes count, the number of steem dollars issued every day increases. It is not limited, only the number of steem coins produced every day. This is why when steem wen to 3 dollars, there was more than enough to go around. If it went to 500-600 as bitcoin has done, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think you are tapping on a wrong place. I meant the money could go to more productive contents creators who can increase Steem value more.
No, I'm not. If that's the message, then reward those doing that, instead of penalizing someone who's doing work that is obviously appreciated by the community, who are supposed to be directing the flow of rewards, unless, of course, like voting in presidential politics, that is all a big myth.
My point is that I can provide the same stats as masteryoda's. But I may not get a whales continous support since he probably thinks I am not a friend of him.
True, but I would give it a shot. Since you are not a whale, which masteryoda is, you probably also won't get busted for it!
@markrmorrisjr
I am a kind of whale... a smaller one (but much greater than masteryoda)