I think it would be really interesting introducing a 100% curation system. In my mind I see thousands of people scouring the page looking at posts with low exposure and earnings and filling the curation gap that we need.

However I feel like this would also lead to even more spam being promoted due to the fact people will try and fin any post just to gain that 100% curation award and what better place to go than some spam post, but all in all I think it would be better than those purely upvoted themselves.

I don't know how well this could work but could we have a different way in enabling your voting power. This will consist of curating other people's content to up your voting power which will then give the ability to upvote your own posts if needed. Forcing people to curate to in the end be rewarded with some power to vote for a post they have done.

I hope we find a way to incentivise people to join the team of long term prosperity rather than short term gains. If we do turn to an 100% curation model do you think it would be good if a portion of that was burned? I feel as if people sooner or later will jump ship taking their profits rather than staying long term fearing the growing supply.

Everyone has this greed to earn money. I'm glad high quality people like you exist but you have whales equally as big who shit post and they get huge peer engagement since people will try every avenue to make money. We will have to be forced to curate or behave in line which is better for the platform since no one has the power to suppress their greed.

Nonetheless thank you for being selfless @kevinwong for the long the long term prosperity of the platform breeding the new kevinwongs of the future. (Hopefully)