Hello, I have a question/observation as do others who do not wish to write it out on here. When you are delegating to some who as you know have used the power you delegated them for bad, do you take that into account when continuing to delegate to them. Basically, there is no vetting or did you have any conversations with some of your larger SP holders on not weaponizing the SP you are doing biz transactions with. Let us propose a scenario: You are aware someone is actively paying/supporting violence/criminal activity or such (again this is just a scenario ;) ).........what do you do? Are you going to establish any type of ethical basis or not so much? Asking for a friend, thanks so much for any insight you have into this.