You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Voting Abuse and Ineffective Curation: A proposal for blockchain-level change

in #steem7 years ago

The idea you've proposed has been discussed by others as well and I know several proponents. It's one proposal for avoiding too much disagreement on the subject of changing the rewards back to 50/50. I see it as a reasonable possibility, although it does add some extra complexity to the user interface. That could be good or bad, hard to say without experimentation.

Sort:  

A little complexity but if introduced like the normal voting slider after a user has earned x amount in Curation Returns, it shouldn't be too much hassle or take very long to get the hang of it.

Perhaps before one gets the slider, their CR is the same as now (or lower) to deter abuse from alt accounts.

Edit: It could also be tied to REP so that way they also need to maintain a high enough rep to get full Curation.

It may be middle ground to lower the barriers for some on the fence to try different.