How complicated would it be to reward users, when they do not vote ?
... in a way that nobody is being forced to vote, but only when they see something they expect good curation rewards for ...
I know this would be a totally different approach, I am just curious, how hard something like this would be to implement ...
Very.. There is no simple way to have users gain rewards without some kind of in-browser mining. And they had something like this in mind for account creation which they ditch to favor locking up the account creation to reduce spam.
So, I doubt a system like this would be made, at least not until after hf21
There already is an inbuilt interest rate for SP holders.
To be more precise with my question:
How difficult is it to decrease an individual account's SP inflation, proportional to their mana ?
I am trying to ask a stinc dev, not you.
I've seen this discussion in the past, allowing stakeholders to lock up their SP in a non-voting state, receive interest similar to bid bot roi but letting those who want to curate and think they can curate better for more rewards do it. It's an okay idea but if any of the recently discussed changes were to come into effect I believe delegating to curation projects or bots that return you the majority if not all of your delegation's curation rewards will be in more favor, not to mention you'll be able to use the downvotes as well.
Maybe not calling them "stinc" would help get their attention to your questions, though.
Sorry if you're disappointed by a non steemit member replying.
'curation projects' like yours ?
You are as bad for steem as bid-bots are.
A lot of problems and leeches here would disappear, if stakeholders were not economically forced to vote.
I will keep calling them 'stinc', after they let this linear rewards mess just sit for 2 years and let a host of bad players stake up heaps.
You're funny, but also weird.