I'm not a fan of downvotes. I mean, I get it, for spam, sure...but that brings a whole new set of problems.
So what's the proposed solution? How do you maintain decentralized governance and enforce downvote parameters at the same time? I see so many posts like this, but never a tenable solution. Without a proposal, it's just empty complaining. Rather than empty complaining, people should be onboarded with the right mindset about what to expect on the mainnet.
People need a realistic expectation of how the system operates when they join, and they are not getting it. I am sure once SMTs/Communities arrive, you can rule downvotes for your community with an iron fist. You will probably be able to disable them altogether.
Made $20 rehashing the recent fiasco. Sounds like a good deal to me!
Yeah, pretty sure this gets split 50/50. But maybe I didn't understand how HF21 worked... ;)
A bit more than that since people sacrifice some curation to be the first to vote to get, ironically, greater curation.
So, $12 is probably closer to the figure.
Nice....Not bad :)
My thought has always been majority rule for downvotes...So random thinking, the majority people 'downvote' a post, then it gets a downvote. Would be pretty easy if it was spam for example, think the majority doesnt want that here...
No idea it it's feasible, cause I have the tech knowledge of a toad...But I know one thing, the more people don't feel valued, the harder it will be to keep them.
And that's really my thing..SBI was a way to make people feel their content is valuable.