I wouldn’t expect anything different from Ned and his “company.” As a CEO, you have a responsibility to your company’s health and workforce. Depending on Ned/STINC - no matter how much or how little - is pretty reckless, given their development track record over the past two years, the attitude/behavior of the CEO and staff, and their continual change of plans and direction.
I’m hoping that you meant “Steem” instead of “Steemit,” but even then, you’re relying on witnesses and a community that still rubberstamp hard forks and fawns over each meaningless/worthless STINC update.
Be careful who you trust in crypto. It seems that most of these “CEOs” and “companies” still fall in the “Just a bit too scammy” category.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply. We're relying on both STEEM and Steemit in 2019. Fortunately, it would take less than an hour for us to switch over to an alternative if STEEM/Steemit completely failed. But you are nonetheless right, it is probably reckless to depend on Steemit at all.
Our company has already been burned by unreliable data vendors, over-promising developers, lying prospective financiers, etc., etc.. So our expectations are very low. And everyone involved in our venture has other primary means of support. Still, I'll look into further decreasing our dependency on STINC.
Yeah, hooking your boat to a sinking ship seems pretty unwise.