Not exactly $1000 posts, but 3x$350 is about the same 😉. I know she posts good content, I'm a follower, but remove the pictures and I guarantee she won't get as much rewards.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Not exactly $1000 posts, but 3x$350 is about the same 😉. I know she posts good content, I'm a follower, but remove the pictures and I guarantee she won't get as much rewards.
Why should she be penalized for being more photogenic than other people who include pictures of themselves in their posts? She creates quality blogs once a day, so people are upvoting her because they like her content, not because she's spamming feeds with cleavage selfies. She's the kind of Steemian we should be lauding, not tearing down because she's simultaneously attractive, female, and successful. Her boobs aren't doing the work.
I'm not tearing her down, I like her blog and I've followed her. What I'm saying is, good looks do help. Perhaps not the boobs, but the legs are certainly having an effect.
An entire industry is built around the concept that good looks sell products. I have no problem acknowledging that. The thing I take issue with is the implication that the boobs are the product that sells here. The content on the pages of the women who do well here says otherwise.
There are plenty of men who are successful on this platform, and no one reduces their accomplishments to superficial reasons..even though attractive men are also more successful than their frumpier counterparts. So why do some people just just throw shade at the women on Steemit?
So why do some people just just throw shade at the women on Steemit?
Not just on Steemit, but everywhere. I guess it's the old stereotypes.
That's depressingly relevant.