You mean using reputation to limit voting ability? If so, it seems acceptable.
Not meaning that it should be accepted, but it should be considered.
It already appeared in the post that the juries may be chosen by the witnesses, but other mechanisms of appointing them should also be considered.
Maybe by some composition of a council of witnesses (PoW), shareholders above a certain size (PoS), and by direct merritocratically elected by the community.
I know this place is going down, have you read berniesanders' recent post about the Asian Scheme?
It just adds to what I already knew.
Immutable blockchain will always end badly and is not efficient.
Waste of space and repetition of data. Too inefficient.
It makes me think the future of Bitcoin is in doubt.
There are already wallets like electrum which spares its owners from replicating the blockchain, but this also means that there will be less witnesses to the blockchain's history of transactions.