@grumpycat has bid with the following voting bots in the last 11 days:
The above 3 are declared by @grumpycat as 6th day voting bots that abuse the system. Yet, @grumpycat hypocritically uses them. Hmmmmmm...
@grumpycat has bid with the following voting bots in the last 11 days:
The above 3 are declared by @grumpycat as 6th day voting bots that abuse the system. Yet, @grumpycat hypocritically uses them. Hmmmmmm...
Also, what’s going on with@uradick? He has posted once but claimed mega rewards! How the fuck does one claim rewards when there is zero activity on account?
Something’s rotten in the state of Denmark!
If you wait a half hour or so after someone posts something, then vote on it, you will get 25% of their vote as curation rewards. That means it's possible to make money just upvoting other people's stuff. When I say you, I mean all upvoters. If there's a lot of upvoters, you have to share the curation rewards with all of them. Posts with high rewards and few upvotes will yield the highest curation rewards.
I think this may be one reason why everyone has their panties in a twist over 6th day voting bots. If you upvote just in time for payout without giving others time to curate, you get all the curation rewards.
I don't think that people get you can still deny others curation rewards on a post you just created. For example, if you time your voting such that the vote happens immediately after you post, you also get all the rewards. I think the window is about 3 minutes.
Scenario
I'm not saying anyone should do this. I have been experimenting with voting bots, but I haven't tried this yet to see if it works. I probably will try it at some point just to find out. That way I can speak on it definitively.
If my theory is correct, the 3.5 day max age rule isn't enough.
This is absolutely incorrect information.
LOL. You can't just drop a bomb like that and not say why.
This is what I based my points off of https://steemit.com/steemit/@gmichelbkk/when-is-the-best-time-to-upvote-on-steemit
It also makes those self-voters extra bad guys because they vote themselves immediately after posting which denies curation with anyone that upvotes with them.
So basically there are a few really smart and really selfish cocksuckers out there with massive SP and they’re all circle-jerking themselves for maximum ROI — everyone else be damned.
The moon and the truth cannot hide for long.
Thx for clarification.
makes sense. threaten downvotes to those that use the service. less use allowing him to get profitable votes from the services.
Fuckin’ Ass-hats
You can’t make this stuff up!