What Just 1000 Years Means: Historic Sites That Just Got Recontextualized

in #tartaria8 months ago (edited)

ssvs.png

Recently, 1000 years have been erased in the community of Tartarian seekers. I'm just kidding, the community is only in heart - there is no name to the pursuit of more knowledge, but we all have a big smile at what revelations are still in store!

While many more theories exist as speculation and mystery abounds in this thriving area of exploration, **there is now irrefutable evidence of a "reset" of time. **

To put plainly, the years have been fudged on us. We think we live in 2023, when in reality, we may be living in 1023.

This is based on at least three archaelogical and old world sites where tampering and fraudelent narrative-telling has been exposed. Many more if you wish to find the buildings with the modified signage and stoneworks tampered with by the establishments(we'll call them freemasons for simplicity).

For the old world buildings example, frequently, "scholars" and other fraudsters removed or added 1000 years to buildings which were dated. We have one such local case in California, exposed on video.

1000 Years. Imagine that!

  • 1800 becomes 800
  • 1500 becomes 500
  • 1999 becomes 999
  • Renaissance becomes art that has no origin in "artistic evolution of society" but just appears out of nowhere
  • Buildings suddenly stand aghast to the landscape they are in: Sumerian buildings in LA, Roman buildings in Russia and China, Gigantic Palaces of Egypt in Missouri

image.png

If we truly live in 1023, then all history as told to use via McGraw-Hill (Freemason text books used in schools, frequently out of date by about 10 years in each Public School), is off by 1000 years, at least!!!

So here is what we can deduce, using step by step reasoning.

Gobekli Tepe: The crutch for a revisioned religious evolutionary pathway to mankind

This site was not built by hunter-gatherers during the Stone Age as claimed, but more likely agricultural societies in the Neolithic era. This calls into question narratives about its role as the first temple and organized religious site.

Gobekli Tepe is used in the narrative to suggest an original beginning to man's pursuit of organized religion. It is neccessary to use it as a crutch for historical legitimacy for further revisionism toward a specific "historic vision" for the modern generation born circa 1970 onward.

Giza Pyramids: Turns massive peopled centers and unknown pyramidal structures found across the earth into a singular wonder, while they were commonplace and not egyptian in nature

The Pyramids of Giza were not burial chambers but had distinct purposes. . This prompts questions about why such elaborate pyramids were necessary so much later. It also connects the Pyramids to all other pyramids build globally in the same manner with heiroglyphics and other languages used in them. Europe and America both have had recent pyramid discoveries, by the same builders. These could not have been the Egyptians but an earlier people.. The pyramids were used to make it appear that Egyptians were very simple and incapable of great technology, using slave labor and oxen only. The pyramids being erected globally indicates this was not for burial or ceremony and there is no "ancient" egypt to speak of - because it is presently on the earth.
The "Ancient Egyptian" history of McGraw-Hill excludes European pyramids, Chinese Pyramids and many more including those found in the United States in great number. They are not burial sites in nature by any means if they were this common, and heiroglyphics are not singular to the so-called Egypt of today.

Stonehenge: No Progress teaching possible if it is newer than we are told, just a modern annihilated site that is a half buried building from a mega-sized society of giants

The builders of Stonehenge must have been Bronze Age cultures like the Beaker Folk rather than late Neolithic peoples as asserted. This eliminates narratives about it being an astronomical observatory for ancient hunter-gatherer rituals. The size of the buildings is critical in the cover up because they serve to normalize blindness toward other super massive stone constructions that could not have been erected by humans of our stature and for our purposes.

Stonehenge is not an astronomical observatory for ancient hunter-gatherer rituals. It is modern but fully destroyed large building that is completely destroyed, with just a roof portion remaining and the rest under the earth.
With no indication of an "primitive people", there is less "evolution" and "progress" timeline history.

  • Giants are absolutely required to explain the super massive stones found in thousands of sites across the earth. There is absolutely no neccessity nor technological know-how (even with today's ai and machines) to construct doors the sizes of apartment buildings!
  • With Stonehenge built by giants and not by cave men or early people, we cannot believe a "humankind's civilizational" progression myth as told by the freemasons in McGraw-Hill textbooks

Mohenjo-daro: The valley was not that important to trade as suggested by the historic narrative, and upends other historic narratives for those regions completely

The Indus Valley Civilization flourished much later and was less tied to earlier contemporaneous cultures like ancient Egypt. This undermines historical narratives about supposed trade links between these regions.

Mohenjo-daro in the Indus valley suggests that people lived there a long time and had little to do with Egyptian people. This tears apart the narrative that Egypt was solely focused in the indus valley but was a much greater area on earth.

The Parthenon: Modern uses, no ancient greek gods or romans but a super massive civilization building vast structures for common purposes, using super-modern techniques beyond mere concrete pouring

The Parthenon's connection to famous figures like Pericles and Phidias is severed. This challenges narratives portraying the Parthenon as the pinnacle of ancient Greek art and architecture. Instead, the Parthenon stands as a ruin that prompts examination of the collapsed, ruined civilization that once ruled over romanticized landscapes, a civilization made mythical fantasy by the History Channel, National Geographic, and numerous Smithsonian/freemason-affiliated institutions spreading conventional knowledge.

The parthenon suggests that the lore of greek gods and roman gods was fabrication and that more modern uses were prevalent for these buildings. As royal halls and government buildings of prominence but not used as auditioriums or gymnasiums for musicians as today. This suggests the area was not important and that the development of Rome and Greece (defining europe) did not go as told in mainstream historic narrative.

This area is expanding rapidly. It is exciting to see the worn fabric of the Order fall apart beyond recognition.

"What is new is probably older than you know. What is old is probably newer than you know."

People can now go into any of their towns and recognize the markers of the previous civilization(s) and know the lies by how the numbers don't line up anymore, the figures drawn in the sand don't stand strong, tall and imposing anymore.

It seems, that all history told to little children, has become a laughingstock of the whole earth and little children now rip apart the Great Lie.