After reading this post I understood a possible good use of reward.app but so far I have seen this service used mainly by those who are in constant power down and are left with little HP and have no interest in Hive.
Consider that in a project where I am a curator, the use of reward app is a reason for exclusion of curation.
Although I have not used reward app I think it is a useful tool if used in the right way and it has a very good and altruistic idea behind it(which I realized today reading your post) but in my opinion the minimum percentage should be 20% because in this way those who want to liquidate rewards and make continuous power downs are balanced by the distribution of rewards to the curators of the post.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah I know curangel doesn't vote on posts using it and that's fine, as I said the liqudation of rewards was just a side-thing of it which turned out to be its main function. I don't think there's a point personally to punish authors that way but it does draw a lot of bad hivers to use it too, rather put that effort into checking who is using it and if they're getting rewarded fairly.