Thanks for the detailed reply.
These reasons make sense, but if an investor wants to buy a token they can always buy Steem on a large external exchange that they are already familiar with and then use it to purchase the token on the SE DEX. That's good for the Steem price.
That's also how ETH became so popular in the first place.
I see that you are trying to achieve greater visibility for Steem DApps by getting their SMT tokens listed on an external exchange to help them raise funds.
This is a good thing, although I'm not sure that simply being listed on an external exchange as small as DayBit is going to achieve that. Their volumes are tiny and they are outside the top 100 on coinmarketcap.
The Steem community is much bigger than a small exchange like DayBit so I'm not sure how it really helps. And it is quite a complicated process.
If it was Binance it would be a different story.
In general I think that attractive functionality drives users to Steem DApps, not external exchange listing which merely attracts speculators, not real users.
True, but users also need to buy STEEMs to use any Steem dApps anyway (Resource Credits).
You’re right, it would be great if we could make a deal with a major exchange, but please consider that this is just our first step, and of course we can tap on bigger exchanges once we made a success story.
We’re already negotiating with other (bigger) exchanges as well, so let’s hope one day all SMT projects can be listed on all the major exchanges.
@tabris I like and agree with your approach on the issue. Having only internal exchanges for SMT tokens does not make them look as trustworthy as having major exchanges also having the said tokens available for trade.
For example, look at the internal markets for Tron based tokens on TRXmarket. If it wasn't for their cooperation with Bancor, those internal markets could be shutdown or manipulated by the app token creators, and the token holders will not be able to sell/buy them on any external exchange. Kind of what happened in the case of Bitconnect.
Having SMTs on both external and internal Steem based markets would be ideal since it would bring more capital into the Steem ecosystem, and it would make the arb bot operators very happy.
Maybe the Bancor market integration would also be a viable option for Steem SMTs...
Hi, thanks for your opinion :)
Again, it's all about "how" we can choose the best option at this moment. Current DApp projects that should make scale up for making the revenue stream are necessary to raise funds in this bear market. It's not like the market situation anymore when any project raise huge funds with gazillion paper long whitepaper. This is why the Steem DApps should go out to the outside exchanges. Most Steem DApps have amazing users and proven dev records rather than just having a gazillion page long wp. We think this approach will open up the new opportunities for SMT projects later on.
One of the great things about Steem is that its open to try all options and let the market decide what works best.
Good luck. I'll be interested to see how this goes.
Yes indeed. Thanks so much for your opinion :)