You have been victim of a @GrumpyCat flag because you or someone else sent money to buy votes from an irresponsible non-GrumpyCompliant service.
@sneaky-ninja and @aksdwi are acting irresponsibly by selling votes to people on their post in the last hours before payout. = 99.99% abuse rate.
Sending money to these bots is also financially supporting for-profit spammers.
To know what voting bot to use, refer to https://steembottracker.com/ and use those that have 3.5 day or less in the "Max Age" column.
Thank you.
I will not use @sneaky-ninja and @aksdwi anymore.
@sneaky-ninja does not fund spam or abuse in anyway. This cat is simply a thief, stealing your money as well as so many others. Not to mention raping the reward pool heavily in the process. This rule of his is not real. It is simply his way of covering up the massive reward pool rape he is conducting on our platform.
In fact, if you would like to see what steps Sneaky Ninja has taken to fight bid bot abuse see this post and this post. There is also much more being done behind the scenes right now and more to come.
@sneaky-ninja is a very responsible bot. This is simply slander to hide ill gotten gains.
@grumpycat
WE WILL RESIST!
We are getting prepared and we are determined to stop you !
FD.
Stop what? Find a way to stop post 3.5 day day voting and do it.
^^^ The adhoc information state is on the rise. Beware the jackboots
Unfortunately, words are not enough for you... The 3,5 days rule doesn't apply to you.
Stop hurting innocent people with fresh posts.
FD.
Are you that dumb?
Is this dumb?
This post was fresh at the time of upvote...not 3,5 days.
FD.
What he said.
He has said that using the bots that vote after 3.5 days will warrant a flag from him. Does not matter if it is a "fresh" post. If the bot service allows a vote to be made after 3.5 days, the user has potential to be flagged.
I'm not on any side of this but since you keep posting the resist thing, at least know what you are "resisting" against. If the bot services only offer 3.5 days or shorter, there is no potential to be flagged based on his claims.