@frot should go to the police then or you should, if it is of actual concern to you. What you are suggesting has nothing to do with this at all. If that is your reasoning, it is completely illogical.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@frot should go to the police then or you should, if it is of actual concern to you. What you are suggesting has nothing to do with this at all. If that is your reasoning, it is completely illogical.
So when you see cyber stalking your first inclination is to not care about another human being being abused?
Morality and ethics are not mutually exclusive to logic in my books.
Another illogical argument.
In NZ, cyberstalking is likely illegal, so, call the police. However, downvoting is not cyberstalking, nor is it illegal. The Hive blockchain or the mechanisms it has have nothing to do with this.
You seem to have missed my point entirely and do not know what you are criticizing.
Best regards.
You seem to not have a logical argument. Have a nice day.
Logic, was never at any point, a part of my objectives when approaching this comment thread.
yes - that is obvious. Perhaps you should revise your approach.
A police officer already interjected into the thread and has stated he will taken personal action if Azircon does not apologise, to my knowledge no apology has been forthcoming, so we shall see what arises.
lol - he will take "personal action"? Perhaps if he is police, he should involve the law if that is being broken. When random people on the internet think the CIA is after them - they likely have some issues.
Here's the comment, read it for yourself - seems legit to me:
https://peakd.com/pob/@orderbook/r2zlun
"Legit"
1 comment 21 days ago, nothing before, nothing since. Doesn't instill me with confidence at all. Funny how little meat any of this argument ever has.
By 'legit', I mean that the sincerity and detail provided in the message conveys a tone that I am open to accepting as being from a real police officer. Maybe it isn't. Having zero history on the account has no baring on whether the person is legit or not.
Oh, so by "Legit" you mean, how you feel about it.
Right. I wonder what the dictionary definition of legitimate actually is and whether your feelings of legitimacy are relevant to fulfil the requirements.
Your are consistent. Unfortunately from an argument perspective, it is consistently inconsistent.
'legit' is a colloquial usage of the term 'legitimate'.
The third definition of 'legitimate' in mainstream dictionaries is:
What is valid or justifiable is subjective and thus anyone can say anything is legitimate, without needing some kind of bizarro external authority to pat them on the head.
Yup. That looks pretty legit to me.
If that is what he wants as an outcome.