I appreciate the courtesy of your reply. While I understand that the nature of my comment was not encouraging, I made every effort not to be insulting in any way. You might note that I mentioned Bitchute and other alternatives to Youtube in my comment as means of not self-censoring your voice and allowing me and everyone else that wants to hear what you have to say to hear what you really think.

You haven't mentioned Bitchute in any post I have seen before, so I was unaware that you curate your videos there. You have never provided a link to that repository, and if you had, I'd view your videos there, as I only watch your videos on Youtube because that's the only place I know to find them. Please do provide links to your content on other sites, so that I may boycott Youtube and still view your forthright and cogent posts.

I realize that being controlled opposition is not something you want to be. It's evident in all your posts that you aren't happy with censorship, propaganda, and intrusive surveillance, and that's exactly why I am a follower of your content. I feel the same way.

But, deleting your videos to keep your channel is self-censorship, and undertaken to please Youtube so that you can keep speaking, even if you can't speak freely. If that isn't allowing Youtube to exercise control of your opposition to censorship, what is it? It is the very definition of controlled opposition, and that is why - and the only reason why - I am not interested in content that you have censored to meet Youtubes standards. If you don't speak freely and forthrightly what use is your speech to me? I can hear anyone that kowtows to Youtube anytime I want. I don't want. I don't follow anyone that allows Youtube to determine what they can say, because I'm not interested in what Youtube wants people to say.

I'm interested in what you have to say, but if you won't say it, what good does it do me to hear what you post?

It is not my intention to insult you. I pointed out that I have no answer regarding demonetization. I pointed out that I cannot provide nominal income to replace what your Youtube channel avails you, and I did that to indicate that I am not unaware of how valuable that income may be to you. However, I also don't post content to platforms that censor me. You might note that all my comments and posts are flagged by bots, and there's a reason I keep posting on this account anyway. @berniesanders, the owner of the bots, wants me to censor my voice, and I defy him. That's the only reason. It would be easy to use another account. It only costs 3 Steem to buy a new one.

I use this one. I'd also watch your videos on Bitchute if I had a link to them there, and never again use Youtube to view your content, for the same reason.

I did not insult you. You may feel it is necessary to keep using Youtube, and I did not tell you not to do that. It's none of my business what you do. What I said is true, and is what you yourself reported: you self-censor your content so that Youtube will let you keep posting it on their platform, and that limits your voice to what Youtube wants you to say. I don't want to hear what Youtube wants you to say, so I won't view your content under their control.

You seem to feel I've insulted you, when all I did was point out those facts. Perhaps it is your self-censorship that insults you, and not my honest assessment of the value of content to me that Youtube approves. I don't actually know. It seems likely though, given your honest feelings about censorship and propaganda I have heard you discuss previously.

I won't tell you what to do. I do want to hear what you have to say when you are free to speak your mind. Please provide links to content where you do that, so I can. I don't want to hear what Youtube approves of you saying. Those are facts, not insults. I consider Youtube the enemedia, and insofar as I am able, I avoid their efforts to sway my opinion.

I hope you do the same, and help keep freedom of speech possible to people whose lives may depend on it.

Thanks!