You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why I've just taken my delegation away from @informationwar

in #blog6 years ago

First of all, I am going to call you out as a huge liar and promoter of bullshit because of this post. This post you made is 100% made up lies with no verifiable proof, just YOUR emotions.

Ok. Cheers for that.
Says a lot.

Everything you say in this post is legitimate paranoid schizo behaviour, if you are a paranoid schizophrenic I am sorry that you have to deal with that your whole life. Such a thing is quite a burden. If you are not, then I have no sympathy for you.

There is nothing paranoid or schizophrenic about facts. You are the one bringing emotional rhetoric into this.
I was explaining the disappointment of a principled organization being infiltrated.

Your over sensitive response is very interesting though.

You do realize that you've lost it, mate?

MY CLAIMS ARE VERIFIABLE (AS YOU WILL SEE)

What EMOTIONAL lie should I debunk first?

Uhhh?? We aren't funded by big pharma or government... You are throwing random words out in a post and proclaiming what you say makes sense. It doesn't, your post and comments are nonsense. Usually you are quite coherent and filled with trolling(of which I usually appreciate). This post and comments contain none of that.

You do understand the concept on analogy? Obviously not... lol.
Strange, but hey.

I just realized - your pissed off 'cos i called @information war stupid.
Ego much? That's pretty stupid as well.

All the people you listed above are excellent content writers.

I would suggest reading my post again but without alcohol.

My entire post was something that you've misunderstood.
(giving credence to the 'duped' scenario, rather than the 'complicit' one)

Sort:  

Yet again, you respond with no proof and just baseless accusations. Someone interested in the truth would post pics/videos/evidence or at the very least some sort of factual story that can be backed up by others. Since you didn't do any of that, all of us would assume you aren't interested in the truth.

I literally invited you to help volunteer with us awhile back and you turned it down.

I am not, and was not angry, and or taking any substance or drinking any alcohol.

You did more than call the informationwar stupid, you said we are controlled by some entity or got tricked into being controlled.

There is something wrong with you and I hope that you get mental help.

I didn't say you were controlled or being controlled.

I pointed out the philosophically impossible position of you being funded, and then supporting, people who do no see truth as a valid reality.
(relative to the ethos of truth in @informationwars).

Since you didn't do any of that, all of us would assume you aren't interested in the truth.

'Assumptions' are made by fools.

There is something wrong with you and I hope that you get mental help.

Not an argument.
I hope your ego gets help soon. It might need it when I (re)release the information....
Oh, information that you already have, btw ! lol.....doh!

"I didn't say you were controlled or being controlled."

This is not true. What you said was:

"They are willing participants in the psi-op."

You may not have meant it, because you state above (for the record, you state it also in the OP) that we are being duped. Being duped and being a willing participant aren't the same thing.

#informationwar. It's not @informationwar. You're not attacking a single account. You're attacking an entire group, of which I consider myself a part, and note that meatsacks constrain us all to various foibles and imperfections (yourself included btw) which requires a bit of allowance in order for us to all get along and work towards common goals we share.

You should note that since I self-identify as an informationwarrior, attacking #informationwar as a group that has been duped is a direct attack on me. I am humble. Such an attack may have merit. I've repeatedly requested clarification, in order that I can judge the merit of the claim, and either refute or admit it.

You do not provide that specific basis, and at this point I am feeling attacked just for being me, rather than any specific thing. Either provide a basis, or cease your baseless accusations.

Absent provision of that basis, I shall judge accordingly, and proceed as is appropriate for any source of baseless attacks.

I apologize - profusely- to you, sir.

I have nothing but the upmost respect for you.

My accusations are not baseless, and I would hope you have the same respect as I afford you in this matter...

Apologies for any offense I have given you... for I never intended it.

( I see you as a true information warrior, sir)

Peace.

I flag trash. You have been upvoted by trash. I have negated the vote from said trash.

You know it's a sign of insipidity that you cannot simply produce content and gain support from that, but instead rely on drama and screwing with other people to generate interest.

Your little GIF seems pretty appropriate for a drama queen, which appears to be the limit of your utility to Steem, H. sapiens, and the world itself.

'Keep your filthy paws off me, you damn, dirty ape!'--Chuck Heston, Planet of the Apes

OOOOOH, I'm going to have some REAL fun with you!!!

You may recall we have tangled before. You didn't have fun then, and I don't think you'll have fun now either. I don't care about my rewards, so your flags have no economic impact on me. OTOH, the issues at hand - censorship, the depression of the price of Steem that is impacting the entire community, and that YOU ARE CAUSING with your juvenile flaggotry, and the general annoyance you cause, are exactly what has triggered me, and will generate continued and increasing opposition to your suppression of the price of Steem.

As usual, I do recommend you think before you act in this matter. You can take a few cents from me by flagging my posts and comments. You will not refute my truthful comments on your actions by doing so, and you will continue to attract attention to that douchebaggery you exhibit. You may consider attention a good thing. That's been your modus operandi to date. It will not continue to be true as more people realize YOU are causing Steem to stagnate. Remember @dan flagging you to -18 rep?

Yeah. You may believe you can silence me. You are wrong. You couldn't even silence @skeptic, and he actually cared that you flagged him.

Quit impacting my blog and comments and I'll leave you in peace - if you start right now. Keep impacting me, and I will join those advocating for flagging YOU INTO DUST. You care about your rewards. That makes you vulnerable. Consider if it's worth being an asshole to me when it's going to cost you money. You can't cost me anything. Go away or continue to lose what you care about with every interaction with me.

I posted the reason i was un delegating from informationwar.
The drama started with the attacks on me.

The facts are there for anyone to find - On the blockchain.

I will be presenting them in my own good time.

Noted. I shall await substantive exposition of that basis when you are prepared to deliver. Until then, I will await that information, and resist further engagement in a conversation in which I am not availed that specific information.

You know it's a sign of insipidity that you cannot simply produce content and gain support from that, but instead rely on drama and screwing with other people to generate interest.

You know it's sign of stupidity that you assume my strategy.
( A strategy I've already laid out for everyone to see, previously in my posts).

My strategy had nothing to do with posts on steemit. Not in the slightest.

Your little GIF seems pretty appropriate for a drama queen, which appears to be the limit of your utility to Steem

And this line had just showed me so much about you.
Cheers matey, you had me fooled for a long time.
Oops! you might have just let other people see a side of you, with that line - one you never presented before. ...Oh well...)

Since I was responding to @iflagtrash, you may be misinterpreting my comments as applicable to you. Please note that my comment was to bernie's bot, and not you.

Edit: to be specific, my comments to @lucylin have been made in previous comments. The comment you, @lucylin, are responding to here, was made to @berniesanders and his bot horde.

It's yet another new low brought to you by @berniesanders (hiding as usual behind an alt account to make it seem like he has friends). Here is an updated list of accounts he uses to harass/flag/spam with. See for yourself.

....You ain't seen nothing yet.. ( you thought I'd gone away from the fight, hun?... peer...lease...)

"I would suggest reading my post again but without alcohol."

Interesting thought. I am sober as a judge, and somehow missing the 'factual' basis for your complaint. However, if I do the opposite of what you advise, perhaps things will become clear to me. I shall consider hitting the bottle hard tonite and seeing if reading your post with one eye closed helps.

I flag trash. You have been upvoted by trash. I have negated the vote from said trash.