You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @curie has supported you - You might want to consider a witness vote!

in #curie6 years ago (edited)

if curie is meant to spread the vote around and find new content i believe they have gotten off track. i dont care if they ever vote for me but it does seem strange that they would vote for the same guy in a 7 day period this many times. curie.JPG

then if you scroll aaaaaaaaalllllllllll they way down to the bottom of the list number 250 has still gotten 3 votes in the last 7 days
curie 2.JPG

Now I may be wrong and have not went and looked at all 250 acounts on that list recieving 3 or more votes but I feel personally curie needs to do an internal audit of who is casting their votes and how. it seems they have given up on looking for new and original content and kinda kicked back and upvoted what comes on there follow list.

EDIT: THIS IS THE TOP VOTED ON AUTHOR: https://steemit.com/colorchallenge/@steemotion/colorchallenge-fridayblue-skull-0cc57d545d483
This is a damn photo accompanied by a 1 sentence stating that the photo belongs to the author. no source , NOTHING. this is bullshit. curie just lost my witness vote

Sort:  

@curie is an f'n scam.
They have been an f'n scam from the very beginning.
I was here.
They reward the select few by making less the value of the votes that you get by their sp advantage in the math.
They know, i called bs when they were proposed.
When a whale, gang, or large bot votes you lose money.
If things were equal here every post would get 5sbd.
That wouldnt be much of a game, but it gives you an idea how much you lose due to whale voting.

You think everything and everyone is a scam!

Just the ones ganging up or dogpiling on to rape the reward pool.

When delegation allowed whales to utilize their idle sp every vote on the platform lost value.
Its just a fact in the math.

When they delegated it to vote bots and sycophants they disadvantaged every other user on the platform.
You included, unless you got some or buy votes, then you are a reward pool rapist, too!

I suspect that @curie will take a look at this post and comment and hopefully make a comment to explaining the voting pattern and for the post you have linked.

Saying that, if you were to do the same review of many of the top witnesses, I suspect you would see a much small vote spread.

well once they convince me that they are paying attention around here i will restore my vote. Not that my vote means anything but i feel it is better placed elsewhere or not at all for now.