A Dash of Sult N Papper 06/07/20> Let’s talk…Domestic Terrorism…and my take on it.

The Attorney General...

The Attorney General, William P. Barr (not his legal name) put out an official (unofficial) statement last Sunday, May 31st, regarding the riots and domestic terrorism. If you happened to see this and read it chances are it seemed just like any other government promise to do something.
We have come to know that nothing will be done. We’ve been to content for too long just accepting the promise and then never actually holding anyone accountable in fulfilling that promise.

How about we start making them accountable? How do we go about making them accountable?

Well, I'm no...

Well, I’m no guzbucking genius but I realize that right now not one person in government is accountable because they aren’t in the constitutional government. So we really need to start right there.

We need to start pressing upon these folks that they have no legal authority what so ever. We are expected to comply with over 180,000 pages of federal regulations yet we don’t hold the very folks who enact those regulations to be held to the same standard. Not one government official has taken the proper oath of office.

Every deck of...

Every deck of playing cards come with some extra cards known as jokers and card games can use these jokers as wild cards. Right now we have nothing but a bunch of jokers that have replaced the legitimate cards in our system of government. It is time we get back to playing with a full deck of legitimate cards in government.

I have pointed...

I have pointed out in previous Daily Doses and Dashes that the very first Acts of Congress spelled out in explicit detail what oath is required to be in the congress and senate in the sixth article of the constitution.
I have also explained that our “government” leaders also decided to go away from the constitution and codify it to get around a round the constitution by making the codes look like the constitution.

Even the US Code demands the exact same oath as the Sixth Article of the Constitution for States, it can be found at the us.gov website.

4 USC 101: Oath by members of legislatures and officers Text contains those laws in effect on June 6, 2020

From Title 4-FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATESCHAPTER 4-THE STATES
Jump To:Source Credit

§101. Oath by members of legislatures and officers
Every member of a State legislature, and every executive and judicial officer of a State, shall, before he proceeds to execute the duties of his office, take an oath in the following form, to wit: "I, A B, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States."
(July 30, 1947, ch. 389, 61 Stat. 643 .)

So the very...

So the very first thing a state official needs to do is take this oath preceding anything to do with caring out his duties of office. No governor, judge, legislator or any other judicial officer has taken this oath; they may have taken other oaths but this oath is the one that gives them authority under the US government.

This has been on the books of the US government since July 30, 1947 so anything your state has done since then is essentially null and void for lack of jurisdiction under the United States Code; let alone the Constitution.

We can start by requiring our elected officials to start by producing their signed and sworn copy of this oath. I have been harping on loss of rights when you claim US citizenship in exchange for privileges but they don’t even have the authority to grant privileges based on this failure on their part.

Next time you...

Next time you end up in traffic court or any other court that your "State" is prosecuting the case against you ask the judge for his signed oath that reads exactly as written above.
He won’t be able to produce it. The same holds true for the prosecutor in the case because he is deemed to be a judicial officer of the State so he is required to have taken the same oath.

“Seems to me judge, or whoever you are, that I must not be in a court for US citizens. I require you to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction because I am a US citizen.”, those will be my words.

I can’t wait to see how the judge will handle that situation. Contempt of court? There is no court, no judge and no prosecutor; it is all done under “color of law” which is a domestic act of terrorism as I will soon explain.

There is an exact...

There is an exact definition of “domestic terrorism” so we may as well take a look at it just so you know I’m not making this shit up. Here we look at TITLE 18 / PART I / CHAPTER 113B of the US Code.

§2331. Definitions
As used in this chapter—

The first four sections have to do with international terrorism. So for brevity we’ll pick it up at number 5.

(5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that—
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States

I could make...

I could make a case for international terrorism with what has recently been taking place but let’s just stick with the domestic terrorism definition.

(5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that—
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping

Breaking it down piece by piece
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State.
How about the police for starters? Look up organized crime and criminal street gangs for starters. They are most certainly dangerous to human life.
(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
Intimidation is standard operating procedure for both the police and the courts.
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
Police unions and the BAR associations are prime examples of trying to influence the policy of a government. Just the fact that police officers have qualified immunity and the BAR has exclusive rights to practice law are just two of many that come to mind. Those would fall under the coercion portion since both groups utilize lobbyists to pay off the politicians to get exactly what they want.
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping
Sentencing people to prison is surely kidnapping and capital punishment is a fancy term for assassination. We also could point to the George Floyd situation that has sparked plenty of mass destruction in several cities around the country and it can be directly attributed to the agents (police) of the terrorist organization.
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
I would say these organizations I’ve mentioned primarily operate in the jurisdiction of the United States so we have that covered as well.

In order to...

In order to take this country back we need to start at the local levels in the courts for starters and then work our way up to the state level. From there it would be on to the federal levels and quite possibly a return to a constitutional republic.

Attorney General Barr mentioned that the DOJ would investigate domestic terrorist organization and even named one suspected group; Antifa.

I can name at least 50 more other ones if he and the DOJ are serious about putting an end to domestic terrorism. Ya’ll have a great week.

Until next time,
Sult

Photo credits: Sult N Papper