I tend to chop between UI's too, especially with regards to curating.
Could you elaborate on this?
If these numbers are more then insignificant, the split of posting and comments for each UI doesnt say anything. Publishing such stats may even harm certain UIs unnecessary.
Yes I can. A UI can be seen as a community. In the world outside of Crypto, users use a single UI for a services. FB UI for FB service, Insta UI for Instagram service etc. Outsiders likely think of HIVE.blog as a different service to PeakD, to LeoFinance, to Ecency. By posting stats on comments through a specific UI, outsiders (and also existing HIVE users who are not familiar with the tech and how to read these stats) may select the UI to use based on these stats. On one hand: Fine, its a free market. On the other hand, these stats are not coming from the UI owners, but from an independent party, in this case you.
That said, I think we shall create a webservice holding all sort of stats and stop posting them. As we need some special post channel, or even better, a webservice where we talk about Leo, HIVE and all so that these posts are not what outsiders will see. But that's a different topic to what you requested and what the original post is about :)
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I take your point, and also use various UIs.
In this post I looked at comments from any app, but am interested also to see which apps are making the comments.