The time tested and apparently best model of content creation and rewards is YouTube. The content is monetized for ever. Sad people here were to adamant to not even borrow the smallest bit from the successful ideas already working.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
YouTube's fundamental problem is that it is centralized. This makes it possible for the owners of the platform to ban, censor, demonetize and shadowban, which they certainly do with abandon these days. Many a content creator has lost his/her livelihood as a result of this. YouTube also takes quite large a cut from the earnings of a content creator. Also, to be monetized a channel has to meet pretty harsh conditions as in a minimum of 4000 hours of videos played in total and 1000 subscribers.
However, perpetual ad revenue for content creators is a pretty solid idea. On LeoFinance, ad revenue earned by the front end is used to buy back the tokens from the market and to burn them. The business model of LeoFinance makes total sense, which is why I think the platform will be successful.
Oh yes I know and agree with YT's issues. I am just saying that an ad supported monetization scheme that pays perpetual rewards has been a winning combo so far.
I couldn't agree with you more on that.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta