As a holder of RUNE, I would be interested in this and am willing to participate, as I already support the WLEO V2 liquidity pool (I also supported V1 ...). That said, I want to be very specific - I support a LEO / RUNE liquidity pool. Followed by, "right out of the gate," a key question:

Why, oh why, would we have the liquidity pool tied to ETH and the associated need to create some sort of wRUNE token (yes, I am aware that the RUNE team has already created this and the needed ERC20 "bridge" - with a 5 RUNE "conversion" fee ...)? I ask, since it was my understanding, in choosing to invest in RUNE to begin with, that they are moving ahead with a decentralized exchange concept that involves setting up native token liquidity pools.

I wrote a post about my concerns with the whole "wrapped" token idea and why I was personally looking for better solutions in the future. RUNE seems to provide one of the most promising answers and, yet, for some inexplicable reason, they have chosen to support a "wrapped" token on the ETH blockchain ...

I don't get the rationale. I do not make any profession to being an expert on RUNE (or anything else ...), so looking forward to seeing how this is answered.

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta