I DO NOT support AI generated text as Hive post

in OCDlast year

I DO NOT support AI generated text as Hive post

Lately there have been a proliferation of Artificial Interlligence generated text in hive. I am actually surprised why it took so long for hive farmers to catch on! Since at hive we get rewarded for text content as blog, and the fact we are relatively small (anything and everything gets voted, some to obnoxious amounts), it is rather easy to generate AI content at hive day in and day out like clockwork. However, I must say AI generated content is NOT original content. Therefore, I will personally try and not support such content. I will also personally try and remove rewards from such content.

image.png

Source

Due to the decentralized nature of hive, I have no authority of telling what hive can or can not do. It is upto the community to decide. However, I can make my thinking visible and I can also request and lobby for the cause to other hive stakeholder so that they do not support AI generated content.

How do we detect

Often, a lot of people who are leaning towards AI generated content are not native English speakers. In that case it is rather easy to figure out the unsual usage of certain words. This is simply because AI learns and it is very good, but it is still biased towards the input.

Community does have a couple of AI detection tools are are working behind the scenes. I am not going to tell what are they and who are behind it. I will only tell you that they are rather good, and have a very high success rate of detection.

My personal views are simple. If someone is smart enought to resort to AI generated content and posting for rewards, all they care for is money. In that case all they deserve is downvote. That said, there are certain gray area where I have seen people use AI generated art, but original writing to support that art and produce excellent content. I am okay with that. Again this is my personal opinion, and I am making it abundantly clear.

I am NOT going to discuss why I am doing it, because that discussion will not go anywhere. I am just telling you this is what I am going to do. You can do research on why it is not acceptable.

Sort:  
There are 2 pages
Pages

Yeah, 100% behind that. A couple of thoughts of which I'm not so sure.

What do you think of smart curation bots who leave an AI comment instant of what we are used to right now with !LOL or !BEER

What to do with AI writing tools, I have a strong idea that those will be as comments as word correction pretty soonish and they will phrase/rephrase for us. Shouldn't we endorse those to increase the level of written content?

AI Pictures & AI Art seem uncopyrightable as intellectual property. Now people claim they modified the left cheek and now it's their original art, well I find it difficult to argue, but of course, The Alien Art Hive Community is doing that for years already. Any thoughts about those?

My last thought would be, that I wanted to see an AI Dev Community popping up on Hive for a long time already. Most of that ppl aren't Software developers but rather run a rented server or have a potent system to play with and add some scripts on a shell. It should be fine for them to share their progress under the correct taggings.


AI-enhanced or completely AI written Content has been on the Chain for more than a year at least. When I started calling out accounts, none seemed to care. In my opinion, the Downvote and Reputation system "as a system" has miserable failed us, but there will be AI Content Attacks on Hive and we might want to get in a position to see them coming and use the tools we have.

lots of questions here, and if I do justice to all of them properly that will be several posts, but let me try. This is my personal opinion obviously:

  1. Curation bot comments: I don't like them. I think they are spammy and they make my contents comment section ugly. That said, I don't vote them. Since hive is decentralized I can't control them either. So I have decided not to care.

  2. I am against AI to assist text writing in general as they are not original

  3. Art is a difficult subject. As you have said AI art is "uncopyrightable as intellectual property". This has been decided. So people can use it, even without citation, and there is nothing wrong or unlawful about it. Again, to be it is all about reward, do I vote such a post that only has AI art in it. I don't. If it is mixed with some original content, depending on content I might. I often do.

  4. I am aware of AI developers. At hive, as a content generation tool I personally do not support them

I will not further inquire, since you've been forthcoming and answered all of my questions.

Ha, we're at the front line, aren't we? We're going to find out first if and how it's possible to fend off AI 'attacks'.

I don't like them. I think they are spammy and they make my contents comment section ugly.

My opinion is:

It let's me track if someone is misusing curation project that are under my management. We are building a better alternative like tipu but till then spamming comments looks like the option to track. (Your post has been curated by "curator name")

Example:

25 people can vote from an account then how to track who voted what? Who broke the set standards?

Also, we already have a solution to "click to reveal" for comment curations. Don't seem like high priority. Personally IU, Discovery-it etc comments are muted by me.

Shouldn't we endorse those to increase the level of written content?

Hive is about people, and stories - not how good they are at grammar.

When I started calling out accounts, none seemed to care.

I do! And would have, had I seen it. IN my community, I'm quick to mute anyone who isn't writing original content.

Hive is Blockchain, the Hive community is about a bunch of things. Original Content OCD Style is the most significant part looking back? Not sure.

The most significant parts are the communities themselves and Splinterlands so far. Meanwhile, the communities are 98% of the time in Discord.

Just giving you a reality check here. We're all part of these ideas surrounding Hive. People and their stories shared in an old-school blog format are one of those.

I'm open to arguments, representing my very subjective pov.

Meanwhile, the communities are 98% of the time in Discord.

Plenty don't do Discord. Plenty. Or, they use it minimally to attend to admin matters. Used to use I all the time and run a massive community there. I don't anymore and avoid it like plague. Many believe Discord is a waste of time and we should be on chain. Threads is a good part of making that happen. I hope.

Interesting stat, 98 percent. Where did you pull that from?

Speak to any curator on Hive, who form a massive part of how content is supported and rewarded here, and they'll tell you original content is everything. Gaming and other ways to earn on the Blockchain are separate from blogging. Of course OC blogging is only one aspect of HIVE, but that's the part curators of blogging content are concerned with here.

I'm not sure what you mean otherwise. What are you trying to say here?

I'm not anti AI. Just anti it being abused to milk the system.

What I'm saying is:

image.png

image.png

The Hive Blockchain is not a webapp, what web2 access point are you using for these comments? PeakD?


Here's the latest post of dalz:
https://peakd.com/hive/@dalz.shorts/comments-on-hive-are-up-durning-a-bear-market That's a lot of comments, I can't do the footwork and compare it to all the Discord channels in action. It's very unlikely that 98% is anywhere close. For some very active Hive Discord users, it's closer to 99.9% and for people such as you, it's the other way around.

Fair is fair, do Hivers exchange 35 million Messages per Month in Discord to create the 98% ratio? That means 13.5 Messages per Second across all the Discord Channels. Wow, well, it's not impossible but highly unlikely, very very unlikely.

Oh so you are saying a lot of a activity isn't actually blogging? Sorry, having trouble understanding what your point is. Yes, that's true of course.

Yes, Peakd.

Sorry I'm struggling to see how this relates to reward pool abuse by using AI to write majority of blog. My bad.

Yeah exactly. Money can always be broken down to trust. Hive Value = Trust in Hive. So the way to interact via Blog was obviously the first entry point. But there's more to it.

It's obvious to me that if the usage of AI helps users to strengthen their bonds and interactivity, the community will become stronger and the Hive Coin Value will therefore rise. That's me and I is only subjective, but the argument against AI-improved content feels to me like a Disney Movie - but the animals can't speak to each other. A chat room full of people from across the world and the admin turns out the auto-translate to English, because of maybe valid reasons. Instagram deleting all Filters for Human Portraits, because it's inauthentic. Do we sacrifice to the holy lamp or are we still cooking?

I can't answer that yet, also I don't have to, because I'm not a community leader. Different Communities will take different paths and in two years, we will be able to compare by looking at objective truth. That's part of the human experience, the Future is speculation, and the present is a very thin layer tainted with subjectiveness, the truth can only be found in the past.

The abuse part is not what has to be discussed, the very definition of abuse has to be adjusted. From word correction by Grammarly to AI rephrasing your written Blogpost down to getting full posts from Bing AI and just rearranging for personal preferences. What is abusive and how can we detect and fight it?

Do we all want to get rid of malicious actors who try to abuse us? Hell yeah.

Thanks for this interaction btw, love it.

untitled.gif

What do you call an airline full of bald people?
Receding airlines.

Credit: reddit
@azircon, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of @manniman

(1/1)
Use the !LOL or !LOLZ command to share a joke and an $LOLZ

I'm with you on this. It's crap and if I see it I will remove as much as I can from it. Sheer lazy farming

It is becoming a big problem. I suspect some rather prominent people are using some variation of this for a while now.

Yes, I do too. What I think they do is put a prompt in then tweak the text of the results so it looks slightly less AI.

It is still quite obvious to see as these people are invariably lazy as well as not hugely bright :0D

I am willing to adjust rewards just on the basis of suspicion, because the posts I am thinking about are grossly over-rewarded anyways. I don't need any other reason usually.

If a post is not very formatted but perfectly written and makes very few personal statements, that is a red flag for sure.

Makes me wonder more and more if we as a community should have a digital ID to verify us. No KYC or something like that. A novel digital Hive-based ID to create deeper trust.

Quite rightly too, it's not as if they would admit it. Or if they did it would be worth done day caveat that they used it as a tool and only took bits of it or some such tosh.

I"ve heard of 'big name accounts' doing this, and I'd sure like to know who - I'm soooo curious!!!!!!

Hahaha, they are clever but you can spot em if you go a looking hard enough. ;O)

Although I do agree that AI-generated text being passed off as original content should not be rewarded (on Hive or elsewhere), I fear that it’s going to be exceedingly difficult to stop.

As a university professor, I’m convinced that there’s no way we can continue relying on essays as a way to gauge student learning and comprehension.

I’ve taken steps to make it harder for my students to rely on AI to write their essays, but it’s an uphill battle that’s only going to get harder.

Even with OpenAI’s classifier, all the students need to do is revise the essay enough to fool the classifier, and eventually other AI tools will do that for them.

We will do what we can. Just like what you are doing for your students. We will make it difficult

I was talking with hubby about this just yesterday. At some point the only way to be sure in schools may be to go back to writing by hand. It seems ironic in many ways, yet it's only really a generation ago that we all hand wrote essays.

I actually had my first encounter last week with a student using ChatGPT to write assigned essays.

Quite frankly, I noticed that the essays were 'too good'. When confronted, the student initially denied using any generative-text tools, but has since come clean.

As I stated in a post about ChatGPT several weeks ago, educators are going to have to abandon essays as a means of measuring student engagement and comprehension (unless the essays are written 'by hand' or proctored).

I agree 100%. I don't like AI writing or art...lazy, uncreative, unimaginative and farmy.

We got to keep at it. There are multiple high rep individuals consistently doing this for reward farming.

Yep, it's reasonably easy to spot. I don't think any of us should be accepting of it though, it's misrepresentation.

We need an 'Ai Watchers' comment on them, like Hive Watchers. I'd really like to know who these accounts are. Once, okay. After a warnin g - nooooo.

I have never been a fan of the downvote function, but for AI generated work ... absolutely. To the language barrier; there are translate apps that allow people to communicate across languages using human generated text.

I am a big fan of downvote. This is the only tool we have to restrict the abuse of the reward pool

Smart move otherwise it's going to turn into a crazy spam fest of junk with no one interacting sadly.

As "smart" as people think ChatGPT is it's actully super stupid it's just good at pulling older content from 2021 or later and rehashing it out with filter words etc. The only thing impressive about it is the speed at which it can do it. Besides that it's dumb AF

It's good that it has been introduced. Now, hopefully, people will think twice before casting their blind vote. It would've been a better practice to get to know the author/blogger a bit better first anyway IMO.

As you know very well, there are many AI text (especially low quality AI texts) floating around hive for a while. It is our collective duty to identify them and have a direct conversation.

Well, I don't know if it is many, but I have seen some that made me wonder if this was actually written by the person. The contrast between person and story was too big -from my gut feeling-. But then again, and this is what makes it difficult to accuse someone for copy/pasting AI generated text, if you're running a business, you probably have been thinking about creating (or you already have) a tone of voice for your business. For example, my blog posts on @xposed, they are in a total different writing style than my personal stuff, but when I write about more "important" things, I can spend a lot of time on the wording. And when I start talking, I probably trip over a few words because my mouth can't keep up.

I have been testing a AI-text generator detector out. Surprisingly, its detection is not as accurate as you may think, which sucks ass, as it can point fingers in the wrong direction (and the irony? it can be used to create text to fly under the radar). Just more proof that AI is not to be trusted without DYOR.

We're dealing with people whose native language isn't English (mine isn't either for example), it's probably pretty easy for people to use AI generated text to translate something from their language in another, right? The stupid thing is, copyright can only be given to -humans- and not AI, because it isn't human (lol).

One way to kill users who publish AI generated texts, is to do a duty as curators: get to know the author first before casting big votes. It takes a long time to create an authentic personality on Hive. AI and bots don't stand a chance against authentic behavior. And if we're 100% sure something is AI generated, nuke them.

get to know the author first before casting big votes.

That's what I've been thinking myself for some time now. Unfortunately, it's not very encouraging to newcomers. On one hand we want to encourage people to stick around, but because of so many bad players it's hard to trust anyone new...

We do what we can....there will always be things which is uncertain and on the cusp.......but there are plenty of things that are 100% certain. We nuke them.

@rubencress can I ask which AI detector you are using? Thanks (PS it's for detecting it in my community) x

Fucking YES. I'm so over it already. A few have been creeping into Hive Garden and I just muted one today. Go dv it for me if you like. And the other day I had an argument with a guy who FINALLY admitted it was AI, and then got annoyed and left the community and possibly HIVE. Do they think we're idiots or something? It's not fair on all the other people here who are trying hard. @azircon, I honestly can't tell you how happy I am to read this post.

https://peakd.com/hive-140635/@whisky2/how-to-grow-lettuce?fbclid=IwAR3kD2slHSA0TW-QJ23cdu6wZZyFoDYDjrHDnS3MSFp-LV-LTAVj9M_3krs

I would have no problem with the images IF he said 'I created these AI lettuces etc' but he's passed them off as his photographs - and the text is clearly AI generated as well. It drives me wild. Hive gardeners are awesome generally, passionate and honest, so when I find one of these I make very clear it's not on.

Yes well said River. AI posts are not original creative content.

This post has been manually curated by @steemflow from Indiaunited community. Join us on our Discord Server.

Do you know that you can earn a passive income by delegating to @indiaunited. We share more than 100 % of the curation rewards with the delegators in the form of IUC tokens. HP delegators and IUC token holders also get upto 20% additional vote weight.

Here are some handy links for delegations: 100HP, 250HP, 500HP, 1000HP.

image.png

100% of the rewards from this comment goes to the curator for their manual curation efforts. Please encourage the curator @steemflow by upvoting this comment and support the community by voting the posts made by @indiaunited.

I think I saw livinguktaiwan write something similar to this at the end of last year just before the holidays.

In my opinion, it’s easier to identify original works since content written from the lives or experiences of others can not be AI written and so have lesser chances of being spun by AI or anything like that.

intuitively it is easy enough to identify still, but that is only because the user haven't spend enough time and effort into it. There is a potential that it can get worse rather quickly

Makes sense. People who will spend a bit more time polishing up the AI crap to make it look less AI might be more likely to evade detection.


Hey @azircon, here is a little bit of BEER from @manniman for you. Enjoy it!

Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your BEER.

Aha bhai, ❤️ nice.

Everything could stay the same,
Or we could change it all.

HIVE is ours and any action to protect our community is welcomed.

I think it is an excellent decision, those AI's have only been created to make humans lazier and less creative (my humble opinion, don't be offended). I think they could be used, but in other ways, other than writing posts or creating images to tokenize them, etc. I really applaud this decision. Although I imagine that there will be many who will not listen and well, I guess that's where the great team of #hivewatchers will come in to avoid curating such publications. Cheers, thanks for your post, very informative.

You are right. It's basically being a freerider in a group assignment. I think most people wouldn't support AI generated text content but this also depends on whether you can tell if it was generated by AI which we might not be able to tell if the Ai was told to make it look like a real person did it? As for the ai generated images I also gree with you there, I think the images are ok as long as they back it up with their own words or maybe used their own drawing originally and AI generated from that ~.

I have a friend who claims he's interested in supporting my work. I think he means well, but every now and again, he says strange things.

He suggests I use AI generated content to "automate" my writing process. I can share more, then earn more, for less of my time...

Maybe because he's a creator, he just doesn't get it. I do it for the art- the respect and the rewards are just consequential of a job well done.

I don't think he'd become a supporter of mine here just yet, but I won't count him out. Glad to know people still value good effort.

Tell your 'friend' that is a sure way to destroy a hive account

Ha. Good thing he probably won’t make one. That’s why I wanna get him to delegate. He’s just not the creatin’ type

The AI is a tool very Useful, but I think that not for Supplant human creativity, or turn it into a cane that does our job at all times.
I am agree with the AI 100 cus it is the future, but always using moderately and with responsibly.

The AI is a tool very Useful, but I think that not for Supplant human creativity, or turn it into a cane that does our job at all times.
I am agree with the AI 100 cus it is the future, but always using moderately and with responsibly.

Often, a lot of people who are leaning towards AI generated content are not native English speakers.

I’ve noticed a few cases where the post itself is in perfect English, but the title is clearly by someone who has a very limited grasp of English. Easy downvote.

Yes, that’s a relatively easy case

Yeah and comments are similar to the title.

trouble is acid, we don't have enough downvote

I agree completely about the AI writing, but I find the AI art generators really handy, I've never been that great of an artist, so being able to have a visual representation for something I'm imagining is really good. Obviously if the content is centred around the piece of art that's bad, but if it's just being used as a thumbnail it's okay IMO.

The whole AI craze has gotten to a point now where it's seeping into everything, not just Hive. I've been coming across a lot of YouTube channels in the last year that seem to be completely AI made, AI script, AI music, AI voice, even AI videos over the rest. Mad really, but that seems to be the way things are going.

I think in the near future writers and content creators are going to need to do something drastic, like completely miss spell words, and use bad grammer and puncuation to prove that it's real haha by 2040 novels written by humans will be a mess, and the AI written ones will be masterworks in comparison.

But yeah, back to the serious note, it's a problem, especially here. I don't really know if it can be stopped though other than people being super suspicious of everyone elses content and not voting or even downvoting it on the grounds that it could be generated. Ofcourse it would be easy to tell whether something isn't personally written content, I.E no opinions/ life experiences referenced genuinely, but there is plenty of content written here that isn't blog style posts, so that would be harder to scrutinise or judge.

!PIZZA !LOLZ

I called the Tinitutus Helpline.
It didn't stop ringing.

Credit: reddit
@azircon, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of @killerwot

(1/8)

PLAY & EARN $DOOM

In future, please do not use pizza and lolz at my post.

Oh, sorry about that. Just wondering though, why?

I usually sign off with them on comments.

I feel they are spammy and I don't see any value on the comments that follows, which are auto-generated.

Personal opinion.

Oh right, that's a fair point... PIZ... oh wait, never mind. Haha

this made my day lol, PIZ....ZA

Thank you, thank you tips hat I aim to please.

Haha, was litrally just about to tip some Pizza, then remembered that it's forbidden.

In the future maybe haha 😋

Joking aside, great write up here, just cross-posted and pinned this on our community. I think other community must do the same or create one to spread awareness about machine-generated text.

🍕 PIZZA !

I gifted $PIZZA slices here:
@killerwot(1/10) tipped @azircon (x1)

Learn more at https://hive.pizza!


~~~ embed:1627777845572390928 twitter metadata:Mjc3MDY0MzZ8fGh0dHBzOi8vdHdpdHRlci5jb20vMjc3MDY0MzYvc3RhdHVzLzE2Mjc3Nzc4NDU1NzIzOTA5Mjh8 ~~~
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people( @creacioneslelys, @seckorama ) sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.

This is what I felt when I heard about chatgpt helping content creator...ho eetly the more we are advancing we are leaving behind all the human touch and thought which is not good at all....the day is not far that we becomes machine slave

Glad someone brought this up. I guess we'll soon be flooded with AI generated text and as you say if there is a way to figure out content that is not original we'll be doing Hive and us a huge favour.

Yay! 🤗
Your content has been boosted with Ecency Points, by @molometer.
Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform!

Support Ecency
Vote for new Proposal
Delegate HP and earn more

Azircon the AI batman 😂😂😂

Although I support the movement 😂😂

I wish I were Batman!

Oh great! Are you going to start a downvoting trail or something of the sorts! I'd love to jump in on that...

I was a little worried about me posting AI generated art but I read that piece at the end.. So I am assuming I am safe... Since I do add my own text content... But it might not be the best 😂😂😂

No I do fully agree, I wonder what's the hype behind this chatgpt... Ive seen it going crazy the last few weeks

I think AI art is okay as long as you say it is and not pass it off as your own freaking photograph, like the post I spotted today.

I agree with your opinion. I've been writing in Splinterlands, and in my opinion, since Splinterlands is very niche game topic, its currently less prone to farmer creating AI generated content. But we won't know for sure in the future.

I could just think some aspect of an original writing: 1) It contains a personalized opinion of the writer; and 2) The writing would use some referral, either a referral link pointing to other paragraph within the posts or link to the writer past content.

I agree 💯

This is a no brainer, dada, posting AI generated writing and trying to get a payout at the end of the week? No integrity. Sadly, I know what you're talking about, and maybe even who you're talking about.

I only use some AI art whenever I can't find a proper image for my writing. You can also be quite creative with AI art; one can only create a good AI image when the text prompts are on point, and that takes quite a bit of time and thought.

I say art is the only form of AI content that is somewhat acceptable. Whether it be on Hive or any other platform, AI art can be used as a secondary addition, to somewhat "enhance" or assist the the main and original content/writing. And of course, it should also be mentioned below that the images were created through the help of AI.

AI art is copyright free. So can be used as a supporting content. I do not vote any picture only posts anyways. Original or otherwise.

As you can see, my decision is immediate and final

image.png

If you see something do let me know. With your reputation pushing 72, you can't ignore your personal responsibility anymore.

Time to give something back. This is NOT a request.

As you can see, my decision is immediate and final

I understood that as soon as I saw the post, dada.

If you see something do let me know. With your reputation pushing 72, you can't ignore your personal responsibility anymore. Time to give something back. This is NOT a request.

I will surely keep an eye on the communities and posts. I'm always on the lookout, but I'm not as active as I used to be, but I'll try to be more observant from now on. I'll notify you if I find something fishy.

There are certain communities on Hive, where you can find a lot of AI generated content and it is supported too. There are certain users using AI, who you can spot from a mile. It's enough to question them about what they wrote in the post and you have the proof. I've been downvoting them for a while.

Please let me know the obvious text content that you suspect of AI generation. Publicly. Here, or better, as a post. Let us have a public discussion.

Yes, I understand what happens when 'shit-hit-the-fan'. Believe me, I have multiple prior experiences. And, NO, this is NOT a witch hunt.

@alenazaa, you may want to read azircon's post. You may find the answer to your question. Also don't forget to look at your engagement.

Any way to start dropping account names with AI generated content on here? Or in some discord? I have spot like a handful of those since a few weeks ago...

Yes, it is possible.

I am mostly interested in text and NOT art. As Art is non-copyrighted

Welp, here you go, this is someone who either does covers or AI text + images posts. User: iamdarrenclaxton. All his latest post were checked with GLTR and GPT-2 Output Detector Demo, and it market 99% AI. So... Im gonna just drop it here. And if you have some discord channel, or you are on Hive-dr, it would be good :) as this is just number 1 on an endless pit.

To clarify, his coverts are original content, so Lets just say that he would rather be undetectable if you don't look at him close enough.

iamdarrenclaxton

You see the result is immediate

image.png

If I catch more people like him, where do I report them? I reported this one on a couple ocations, as he has been doing AI post since weeks ago. But no one did nothing.

Report at the comment section of this post

Well, If Hive-dr and hivewatcher do not give me any heads up, I will. Anyway, good job and see you aroudn :)

I agree AI content should be identified and called out. I follow a few people that have used AI art with their stories or discussed how AI is being/might be used in their professions. It seems clear what is legitimate discussion/use and what is abuse.

Please call out then. AI text only please.

Completely agree, this can cause many problems in the future and give the facility to many people who opt for this system both to perform work of his institute, 100% agree with you friend.

My personal views are simple. If someone is smart enought to resort to AI generated content and posting for rewards, all they care for is money. In that case all they deserve is downvote.

Oops, well said AI = downvote !

I support this 100%. It seems like another basic detection would be personal pictures.

Yes. That is one of the reason, I suggested personal pictures for PH community. That helps us in two ways. Helps us understand and know who you are. Also makes it hard to generate automated content.

Great! Fully agree on this. I've heard some news about student made AI plagiarism detector hopefully devs working behind the scenes are making similar one to make Things work fine and same for everyone.

It's a shame, I really do see the value in writing original content, it is a way to express ones thought's and feelings. I will pay personal attention to all posts generated through TeamPH and will support this initiative especially within our community. Thank you @azircon !

Appreciated. That’s the reason I insisted on personal and local pictures + life stories. AI can’t do that

Our community is starting to write more now, even myself, I am trying to reserve posting every day as opposed to every other day to ensure quality content only but always feel like writing. This competition has really had a positive effect, I hope we get a few more entries before competition closes.

Finally someone has stated his stance on ai generated contents. Which I will personally use as reference in future. Thank you for this. It's time to go on rogue mode to stop/limit ai generated contents from HIVE.

In this same context, I do have suspicion that This Post is probably generated by AI (I cant prove it though). Additionally, this person has been spamming bit too much for past few months even after I have warned him several times.

Ask him to reduce the post frequency.

This actually made me laugh at first as I thought, "hmm I guess people COULD do that, but why?" Sometimes I'm a bit too innocent for my own good lol. But, for me, why this is sad, is I always say that Hive (and steemit when I started there) was like the glory days of the interwebs when personal blogs were a thing. Pre too much facebook, tik tok, instagram etc I LOVED that it was like a great place to read personal journals and almost like ZINE quality publications by individuals. I LOVE that Hive still had that feeling, Dear Internet GODS please don't take this last bastion of that away!

Soon, we won't even need humans to read anything we'll just have the ai bots do it, filter it and implant what we 'need' in our brain chips...Brave New World eh?
INteresting @azircon

How would you feel about AI generated writing that's edited, i.e., polished and personal7zed/customized. Perhaps generated through the burning of a token?

Don’t know about burning of a token. Not sure what that means. But if there is enough editing then it’s possible to consider it. However then it’s defies logic why would anyone do it. They can just write original post.

Because I'd eventually like to have this service, that tells the heroic details of my splinterlands battles, that I don't have to write myself. Pay a bot to pull hit and miss stats and flesh them out, with me adding tweeks here and there, to direct it, and maybe another bot to create artwork of different scenes within it, and now my blog has an ongoing story about how awesome I am. 😁

Think of it as a bot bard we can hire to sing our praises.

Yeah in that case you don’t need the rest of us on this blockchain. Do you?

I don't understand the question. You're for whom the bot bard sings.

Edit, now I have time...

Imagine, if you will, you're strolling through the Splinterlands with Daria Dragonscale... discussing how brutally to beat a kobold slave when they fail you, or whatever, and you happen across me, in the bushes, with Mimosa Nightshade. Obviously, I'm not gonna want Naga Assassin finding out what I'm up to, on the sly, so I have Mimosa summon up a squad of shut yo mouth to break out, and open up a can o' whoop ass to keep you from loose-lipping me in the ship and you beat me like a red-headed step child. Don't you agree that's a tale in need of being told, with artwork?

Is this AI?

Not sure who will read it. But with enough editing, maybe.

The same people who read season report cards?

It seems like it would be fun whether it's good or bad. If it's good players can get a passive comic based on their happenings in splinterlands and if it's bad it's like watching a puppy gleefully trip over its own big feet.

Nm... I don't think this really relates to what you're talking about anymore, and I'm probably on the bleedy edge of rambling off into Dog knows where, so... NINJA SMOKE VANSIH!!

I'm with ya! Being a photographer and not a writer I considered using AI for my posts. But overall it just I just get an icky feeling at the idea. Its not original or you.

I 100% agree on this. It does not promote self growth and is just aimed at extracting value in the system without putting any effort. As for me, I have spent long amount of time researching for a content, customizing images and sharing my individual thoughts for the topic I'm writing and when I finished writing them, I feel a sense of accomplishment regardless of it being rewarded or not and I think I have improved so much for the past 10 months looking at my Splinterlands content alone but I still strive to make it better and better.

permission to ask can we use google translate or can you give an example that includes ai. answer please

full support

Been so busy this week and just came across this post, which I fully agree and support. This whole AI thing is giving me massive concerns since ChatGPT appeared last year, and I know for sure there are more and more AI generated content these couple of months.

At the moment I have refrained from DV them yet, bar one account. Their chances of curation is reduced by what is within my control which is not a lot but sizeable for abusers.

I'm pretty sure as the detection tools become more mature, and I'm confident I can pick out accounts that AI generated content my DV will be there as well. Curators just need to spend more effort to analyse the post instead of just supporting a post that has a wall of well written text and good photos. Sometimes content is just too good to be true.

Hey @livinguktaiwan me too re our Discord convo. This post made me so happy. @itsostylish did you catch it?

https://leofinance.io/threads/@riverflows/re-leothreads-6iv71
https://leofinance.io/threads/@awildovasquez/re-leothreads-26r6dhvog
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the people ( @riverflows, @awildovasquez ) sharing the post on LeoThreads.

Yes I agree with you, keep ChatGPT bot posts out of our Hive.

There are 2 pages
Pages