If you want to mess with curators, go ahead. Just don't complain when you get downvoted or muted.

Ah! now that's a pretty arrogant statement my dear @riverflows. ¡Just get off your high horse!

You "curators" are really funny in your twisted way of thinking and evaluating or quantifying the true value of a post to be upvoted on and rewarded. And as for the downvotes, who the hell grant you "curators" and high HP hodlers the right to steal the "curation" rewards from those who differ from your sick way of thinking and actually upvoted such content?

In my case, I really don't give a fuck if a post has been written by an AI, a translator (another form of AI) or by a human to be upvoted by me. As long as the content may be interesting, useful, insightful, enlightening, smart, well thought out through a witty prompt to the bot to redact the damn thing with a valuable message to convey, these will count with my support.

I have never downvoted or downvote any publication at all. ¿Why would I do that? If I don't like it or I don't find it valuable, I just don't upvote it and reward it and that's it. I just will keep going in the search for something with value to vote for. As simple as that.

I am not also a "curaitorr" eh? ¡Of course I am one! The only difference is that I am a free agent. A freaking "curator" free from the pressures and whims of your owners & masters who impose an agenda on you and prevent you from exercising your free will on the matter. Because it's a freaking job for you! Can't you see it?

But what we're not okay with is people using AI to come up with the ideas, or write the post based on an idea.

I wonder from where the hell came and did you get the idea to write this post? Everything you have written here today did not come to you from what others have already thought and written about it? Where do you get the ideas and inspiration to create something if not from what others have already thought, said and created before you?

Why do you have to care if said ideas and inspiration came entirely from a human mind or were perpetrated by an AI that was obviously triggered through a human with a witty and accurate question or prompt to generate and write such idea? ¿What's really the difference? ¿WTF is "Original Content" anyway?

If the community rules say 'no AI generated content', what makes you ignore that?

Rules are made to be broken. Especially the stupid and pointless ones. And that's why there are only two options, either, ignore them or fight them so that they change them for a more just and reasonable ones. };)

Cheers!! :)