You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 1500+ Hive Up For Grabs Just For Engaging Your Followers - Join Operation #Ping! ☄️

in #hive2 years ago

The problem is how the ping contest got percieved as spamming for others, most of the ping comments were just spam, neither were original or intentional, you just pushed people to "make engagement" but is a phony and lame excuse of engagement, and some curation teams dint find it "cool" or "nice", That is why i woulnt join your effort but i did found it quite cool and a bit of a good idea as well, but the idea ended up getting a lock of backslash for reasons i dont know.

The problem is how you got percieved with this idea, and the reasons i can think of are the following.

  1. The profits of the contest, The fee of entry on the contest allows to be possible on theory to actually have profits for the account of comet ranker, that in itself is something most people wont like, especially the extreme politically correct faction of hive, who are in the most part, those dv you have.

  2. People like free stuff, basically having a "Fee" for joining of X number of hive per Y level is the anathema of how a ""Hive contest works" so far, a more Lmac way to approach it would have actually be better, having commenters use peakd and place a share of the profits to the comet ranker account would have being better...

  3. Is kinda intrusive to make comments that are anything but honest or sincere, im a hardcore commenter as you have noticed, in fact by the time you proposed a coments curation proyect, i had being part of another curation proyect for comments since about a year, hispanic community have a while doing it actually, the contest that they made to get more engagement ended with a lot less of backslash, havent done another one in a long while btw, i should push elcomentador to do another one.

  4. So you think i find intrusive to comment? No, i find intrusive to comment on every follower blog, Most of my followers are either phantom accounts, curation proyects, curation team members and some naturally ocurring followers(These is my target public). Only the last section is worth commenting on, Commenting on bots, abandoned accounts or similar things is completly useless, making that as part of your rules also heavily influences on how your contes got that bit of backslash.

Sort:  

Thank you for sharing your opinion.

I'll give your thoughts a read after Operation #Ping concludes... But before I do that...

I'll let you know... This is not spamming the blockchain.

This is simply:

  1. Clicking on your followers

  2. Going to their latest blog post

  3. Reading the blog post

  4. Leaving a thoughtful comment on that post
    The same exact thing we all do here day in and day out but with these additional steps.

  5. Noting who responds back

  6. Reporting that back to @Comet.Ranker.

Please Note: Only the authentic comments that get a response are eligible to win. This is called a #Ping Back. If someone copies and pastes a response or makes a lame attempt to connect... they typically will not get a response back for their comment... and they will not register a conversion of their initial '#Ping' into our backend systems. So Operation #Ping only incentivizes and rewards ATHENTIC ENGAGMENT.

If you have a chance you might benefit from reading the #CometWeek White Paper:
https://ecency.com/hive/@wil.metcalfe/launching-cometweek-1000-hive-reward

And you might also benefit from a careful re-read of the Operation #Ping initiative to better understand it's inner workings:
https://ecency.com/hive/@comet.ranker/1500-hive-up-for-grabs

I'll leave it there.