The "No Additional Airdrop" proposal has an extended voting period well into the future. This will allow it to serve as the companion to any individual proposals or groups that may come up after the main voting. It allows for the community to give feedback on the airdrop outside of the context of the return proposal, saves anyone who chooses to create an additional "for" vote the cost of creating an additional "against," and allows those who are against airdrops to vote without impacting development of community proposals seeking funding unrelated to initial distribution.
I think this is an important part that everyone needs to read and reread.
i don't understand this.
It means that individuals can create their own proposals and be funded IF their proposal is above the 'no more airdrops' proposal. No need to create 2 separate proposals for each case.
Anyway, I'm sure that 99% here agree to vote for individual proposals positively (If that individual deserves so).
The problem is that a lot of people in those lists are mixed with people who deliberately supports Steem, and no one (myself included) is going to give that people wings to keep attacking us.
It means that Proposal #103 votes against Proposal #101, Proposal #102 and every future individual proposal
So more I begin to understand the proposal so more I'm with @nonameslefttouse : abstain!