mrjohnson, writing "@mrjohnson", you summoned the info service of @qed: 78.861% of steemers have lower reputation than mrjohnson. 17.937% of steemers signed up later than mrjohnson (2017.06.21 at 22:51:57). Hope that helps. Take care!
Sorry, viniciosanches, the service only works for people who signed up before this Friday, hahaha.
You will be able to use it when I update the data next week.
But between you and me, I can tell you your public account snapshot:
swelker101, writing "@swelker101", you summoned the info service of @qed: 90.418% of steemers have lower reputation than swelker101. 40.278% of steemers signed up later than swelker101 (2017.05.25 at 12:40:36). Hope that helps. Take care!
18.632% of steemers have lower reputation than lynor. 12.655% of steemers signed up later than lynor. And lynor signed up on 2017.06.24 at 19:47:33. Hope that helps!
Okay qed, here the infos: 78.965% of steemers have lower reputation than jimmyhmiller. 9.791% of steemers signed up later than jimmyhmiller. And jimmyhmiller signed up on 2017.06.27 at 03:43:06. Hope that helps!
Okay qed, here the infos: 99.997% of steemers have lower reputation than knozaki2015. 94.432% of steemers signed up later than knozaki2015. And knozaki2015 signed up on 2016.07.13 at 06:19:33. Hope that helps!
Okay qed, here the infos: 75.485% of steemers have lower reputation than qed. 4.561% of steemers signed up later than qed. And qed signed up on 2017.06.30 at 19:04:21. Hope that helps!
If you are not aware steemtools.com has a lot of the information you brought up at steemd, steemdb, and asksteem.com.
I hope you put out authentic content rather than the fluff that makes it to the trending page.
I'd most like to have a way to separate the mediocre from the exceptional, everybody loves a winner, but those towards the bottom of the middle are the ones I would like to see highlighted and improved.
Haha, I see you're concerned for the quality of the site :D
Professionally I develop probabilistic algorithms for augmented reality and I'd like to talk about formal logic here. I made two lengthy entries starting off the topic, but it seems like there are more web developer kind of programmers here than mathematicians. I'll see what I can do or which content I can bring to the table fits.
If you could crunch the numbers that tells me how many man hours went into supplying all the goods and services in the last 12 months so that I could figure out what each person's share of that came to, we could set about accounting for things in things other than money.
If all the work in the world was divided evenly among the able we could escape the 40-40-40 trap.
Okay cryptoinvestor, here the infos: 49.718% of steemers have lower reputation than cryptoinvestor. 46.891% of steemers signed up later than cryptoinvestor. And cryptoinvestor signed up on 2017.05.11 at 10:58:12. Hope that helps!
You gotta use lowercase letters, because all usernames on Steemit are as such. Also, akemi is a username that was registered 2016-11-30 at 11:28:57 but never did a single action and so stayed at the initial 25 reputation.
If you want to know about your own username, you have 48878703165 reputation (the 41 is just rough a logarithmic representation, a function that's meant to go up very slowly) and 76.163 of users have a lower value. You signed up at 2017.06.23 at 23:59:33 up until last friday when I downloaded the data, steemit has grown by 13.957%. In fact we two have extremely similar data.
High five :)
Okay qed, here the infos: 76.163% of steemers have lower reputation than artkemi. 13.957% of steemers signed up later than artkemi. And artkemi signed up on 2017.06.23 at 23:59:33. Hope that helps!
By just writing "@iamsgr", you summoned the blockchain info bot: 95.673% of steemers have lower reputation than iamsgr. 52.263% of steemers signed up later than iamsgr (2017.03.28 at 04:14:54). 100 steemers are followed by both of you. Like @irawandedy, @feruz,.. 100 steemers are following both of you. If you got more than 100, then that's a lower bound. Hope that info helps, iamsgr. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
There's a storm right now in Vienna and my stream won't start. What the bot would have replied is the following:
"By just writing "@papa-pepper", you summoned the blockchain info bot: 99.992% of steemers have lower reputation than papa-pepper. 91.367% of steemers signed up later than papa-pepper (2016.07.16 at 03:36:36). 5 steemers are followed by both of you. Like @amy-goodrich, @akrid,.. 1 steemers are following both of you. Hope that info helps, uruiamme. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!"
Haha, Thanks, bot! The weather's clear right now, but we've have our fair share of hail and thunderstorms this year. I think I own 3 UPSs and a handful of surge protectors now due to the lightning we get a lot.
Hi ausbitbank,
I'll only have it running 24/7 when I have a little more than 3 calls a day ;)
For the rest of the day it's on, though. You can try other users too! And I'll probably do another post on an update today.
Cheers!
By just writing "@ausbitbank", you summoned the blockchain info bot: 99.923% of steemers have lower reputation than ausbitbank. 95.751% of steemers signed up later than ausbitbank (2016.07.11 at 10:53:36). 71.595 was the exact reputation of ausbitbank 4 days ago (update Fridays). 0 steemers are followed by both of you. 0 steemers are following both of you. Hope that info helps, qed. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
By just writing "@financialcritic", you summoned the blockchain info bot: 92.115% of steemers have lower reputation than financialcritic. 32.206% of steemers signed up later than financialcritic (2017.06.12 at 18:48:09). 51.360 was the exact reputation of financialcritic 4 days ago (update Fridays). 100 steemers are followed by both of you. Like @doitvoluntarily, @charlz,.. 100 steemers are following both of you. If you got more than 100, then that's a lower bound. Hope that info helps, financialcritic. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
By just writing "@juliakponsford", you summoned the blockchain info bot: 94.851% of steemers have lower reputation than juliakponsford. 16.760% of steemers signed up later than juliakponsford (2017.06.22 at 21:07:24). 54.329 was the exact reputation of juliakponsford 4 days ago (update Fridays). 0 steemers are followed by both of you. 5 steemers are following both of you. Hope that info helps, qed. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
By just writing "@silverbug", you summoned the blockchain info bot: 92.573% of steemers have lower reputation than silverbug. 47.551% of steemers signed up later than silverbug (2017.05.10 at 01:34:18). 51.822 was the exact reputation of silverbug 4 days ago (update Fridays). 100 steemers are followed by both of you. Like @ascotparnell, @akudinobi,.. 100 steemers are following both of you. If you got more than 100, then that's a lower bound. Hope that info helps, silverbug. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
@brendanwenzel
Off right now, but you're at
50.217124
@honolulu
I had turned it off since - I might bring it back another time.
@mrjohnson
mrjohnson, writing "@mrjohnson", you summoned the info service of @qed:
78.861% of steemers have lower reputation than mrjohnson.
17.937% of steemers signed up later than mrjohnson (2017.06.21 at 22:51:57).
Hope that helps. Take care!
@viniciosanchez
Sorry, viniciosanches, the service only works for people who signed up before this Friday, hahaha.
You will be able to use it when I update the data next week.
But between you and me, I can tell you your public account snapshot:
name: Vinicio Sanchez,
location: Seattle, WA,
created: 2017-07-07T20:19:54,
last_account_update: 2017-07-08T11:33:15,
post_count: 12,
voting_power: 9505,
reputation: 38566801532,
followers:
cryptoriddler, digitalplayer, farhanrafique, greatvideos, maxer27, mekong and finally razvan-stanciu
Thanks for the info though :)
@swelker101
swelker101, writing "@swelker101", you summoned the info service of @qed:
90.418% of steemers have lower reputation than swelker101.
40.278% of steemers signed up later than swelker101 (2017.05.25 at 12:40:36).
Hope that helps. Take care!
@evdoggformayor
Sorry, haven't had it on in a while due to the lack of requests.
@lynor
Okay lynor, here the infos:
18.632% of steemers have lower reputation than lynor.
12.655% of steemers signed up later than lynor.
And lynor signed up on 2017.06.24 at 19:47:33.
Hope that helps!
@jimmyhmiller
Okay qed, here the infos:
78.965% of steemers have lower reputation than jimmyhmiller.
9.791% of steemers signed up later than jimmyhmiller.
And jimmyhmiller signed up on 2017.06.27 at 03:43:06. Hope that helps!
@steemsports
Okay qed, here the infos:
99.998% of steemers have lower reputation than steemsports.
67.571% of steemers signed up later than steemsports.
And steemsports signed up on 2016.09.16 at 22:30:39. Hope that helps!
@knozaki2015
Okay qed, here the infos:
99.997%
of steemers have lower reputation than knozaki2015.
94.432%
of steemers signed up later than knozaki2015.
And knozaki2015 signed up on 2016.07.13 at 06:19:33. Hope that helps!
@qed
Okay qed, here the infos:
75.485%
of steemers have lower reputation than qed.
4.561%
of steemers signed up later than qed.
And qed signed up on 2017.06.30 at 19:04:21. Hope that helps!
Welcome to Steemit.
If you are not aware steemtools.com has a lot of the information you brought up at steemd, steemdb, and asksteem.com.
I hope you put out authentic content rather than the fluff that makes it to the trending page.
I'd most like to have a way to separate the mediocre from the exceptional, everybody loves a winner, but those towards the bottom of the middle are the ones I would like to see highlighted and improved.
Haha, I see you're concerned for the quality of the site :D
Professionally I develop probabilistic algorithms for augmented reality and I'd like to talk about formal logic here. I made two lengthy entries starting off the topic, but it seems like there are more web developer kind of programmers here than mathematicians. I'll see what I can do or which content I can bring to the table fits.
If you could crunch the numbers that tells me how many man hours went into supplying all the goods and services in the last 12 months so that I could figure out what each person's share of that came to, we could set about accounting for things in things other than money.
If all the work in the world was divided evenly among the able we could escape the 40-40-40 trap.
@cryptoinvestor
Okay cryptoinvestor, here the infos:
49.718%
of steemers have lower reputation than cryptoinvestor.
46.891%
of steemers signed up later than cryptoinvestor.
And cryptoinvestor signed up on 2017.05.11 at 10:58:12. Hope that helps!
@Akemi
You gotta use lowercase letters, because all usernames on Steemit are as such. Also, akemi is a username that was registered 2016-11-30 at 11:28:57 but never did a single action and so stayed at the initial 25 reputation.
If you want to know about your own username, you have 48878703165 reputation (the 41 is just rough a logarithmic representation, a function that's meant to go up very slowly) and 76.163 of users have a lower value. You signed up at 2017.06.23 at 23:59:33 up until last friday when I downloaded the data, steemit has grown by 13.957%. In fact we two have extremely similar data.
High five :)
@artkemi
Okay qed, here the infos:
76.163%
of steemers have lower reputation than artkemi.
13.957%
of steemers signed up later than artkemi.
And artkemi signed up on 2017.06.23 at 23:59:33. Hope that helps!
omg that was actually pretty cool, thank you so much <3
Next I'll add a feature where you can see which subscribers you share. Stay tuned.
All right!
@iamsgr
By just writing "@iamsgr", you summoned the blockchain info bot:
95.673% of steemers have lower reputation than iamsgr.
52.263% of steemers signed up later than iamsgr (2017.03.28 at 04:14:54).
100 steemers are followed by both of you. Like @irawandedy, @feruz,..
100 steemers are following both of you.
If you got more than 100, then that's a lower bound.
Hope that info helps, iamsgr. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
@papa-pepper
Good evening uruiamme,
There's a storm right now in Vienna and my stream won't start. What the bot would have replied is the following:
"By just writing "@papa-pepper", you summoned the blockchain info bot:
99.992% of steemers have lower reputation than papa-pepper.
91.367% of steemers signed up later than papa-pepper (2016.07.16 at 03:36:36).
5 steemers are followed by both of you. Like @amy-goodrich, @akrid,..
1 steemers are following both of you.
Hope that info helps, uruiamme. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!"
As a bonus, here's a snapshot of your data: https://pastebin.com/rf9y0tzb
Haha, Thanks, bot! The weather's clear right now, but we've have our fair share of hail and thunderstorms this year. I think I own 3 UPSs and a handful of surge protectors now due to the lightning we get a lot.
Where's that? US?
By the way you asked for a high rep steemer...
If you want a spoiler for an upcoming post, here's some stats:
pos | lead | total rep | log rep | steemer
1 | 99.998% | 742411485449356.0 | 77.835 | @steemsports
2 | 99.997% | 631430411249295.0 | 77.202 | @knozaki2015
3 | 99.996% | 544288969604459.0 | 76.622 | @gavvet
4 | 99.994% | 513192385230850.0 | 76.392 | @krnel
5 | 99.993% | 467078536674968.0 | 76.024 | @ozchartart
6 | 99.992% | 387692240778877.0 | 75.296 | @papa-pepper
7 | 99.991% | 375260765770522.0 | 75.168 | @ericvancewalton
Evening, the bot is active again and here the full list.
Sunny weather today, too :)
@ausbitbank
Hi ausbitbank,
I'll only have it running 24/7 when I have a little more than 3 calls a day ;)
For the rest of the day it's on, though. You can try other users too! And I'll probably do another post on an update today.
Cheers!
@ausbitbank
By just writing "@ausbitbank", you summoned the blockchain info bot:
99.923% of steemers have lower reputation than ausbitbank.
95.751% of steemers signed up later than ausbitbank (2016.07.11 at 10:53:36).
71.595 was the exact reputation of ausbitbank 4 days ago (update Fridays).
0 steemers are followed by both of you.
0 steemers are following both of you.
Hope that info helps, qed. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
@financialcritic
By just writing "@financialcritic", you summoned the blockchain info bot:
92.115% of steemers have lower reputation than financialcritic.
32.206% of steemers signed up later than financialcritic (2017.06.12 at 18:48:09).
51.360 was the exact reputation of financialcritic 4 days ago (update Fridays).
100 steemers are followed by both of you. Like @doitvoluntarily, @charlz,..
100 steemers are following both of you.
If you got more than 100, then that's a lower bound.
Hope that info helps, financialcritic. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
@juliakponsford
Sorry, I was preparing some raw data 20 minutes ago.
For starters, you current reputation is 54.784149.
@juliakponsford
By just writing "@juliakponsford", you summoned the blockchain info bot:
94.851% of steemers have lower reputation than juliakponsford.
16.760% of steemers signed up later than juliakponsford (2017.06.22 at 21:07:24).
54.329 was the exact reputation of juliakponsford 4 days ago (update Fridays).
0 steemers are followed by both of you.
5 steemers are following both of you.
Hope that info helps, qed. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
@silverbug
By just writing "@silverbug", you summoned the blockchain info bot:
92.573% of steemers have lower reputation than silverbug.
47.551% of steemers signed up later than silverbug (2017.05.10 at 01:34:18).
51.822 was the exact reputation of silverbug 4 days ago (update Fridays).
100 steemers are followed by both of you. Like @ascotparnell, @akudinobi,..
100 steemers are following both of you.
If you got more than 100, then that's a lower bound.
Hope that info helps, silverbug. You can ask @qed for more details. Take care!
@adsactly
Turned it off right now. But fyi your rep is
51.944524
Let me know if you want more info. And see also this post.
Take care
@qed
@onealfa
Hi there. The bot is off now, but your rep right now is
56.669547
Tell me if you want to know something else.
Take care!
Not at this time. Thanks. Just wanted to see what this bot can do. I love trying new things...
I'm very interested in what people think could be of use here. So if you have an idea, shoot me.
@storcogato
Your rep is 55.767072, mate.
@dbudhrani