Wow! This looks absolutely brilliant. And idiot proof! I love the safety net feature with delegations. Looks like I have a new go-to tool for my delegation needs!
If anyone is suspicious of a project's voting pattern, I recommend asking the project how they do it. I know that over on the block, for example, our rule is that no members may suggest their own post for voting. So even when an admin's post is upvoted it's because others on the leader team believe it should be supported. Other projects likely have similar safeguards in place, so it's worth asking questions before making a decision!
Finally, I want to add my thanks for including The Writers' Block, my own "home" project. This site looks like an awesome project for the Steem community.
Yeah I know, it is merely pointing out votes, but by no means is a bad thing.
My apologies. Didn't mean to imply you were judging us. You said yourself people shouldn't be harsh. I didn't feel judged by you. I realized how it might look to others and that other projects might look unfairly suspicious. The stats are essential. But wanted to make sure other site users considered the possibility that admin votes weren't decided by the admin alone on projects before judging their voting patterns. If unsure, it's good to ask what system is used. I'm sure others have a process similar to ours. It felt wrong to our community to exclude active contributing members from benefitting from the community power, so we tried to set up a simple safeguard. I've manned the block account myself on occasion and hitting the upvote on my own feels creepy, but it's a signal from others in the community.
I wish steemauto had an "exclude self" option in curation trails as well, since that adds true self votes.
:D please dont aplogise... i did not feel offended, exactly what you say is what i meant but my english is not as expressive as I feel what i try to communicate haha :)