Crypto Is Dead? Long Live Crypto.

I’m spending much more time on X lately and yesterday I came across one of those rare posts that hit the metaphorical bullseye. Crypto Is Dead. Admittedly, the title is a bit click-baity, but the article itself carries enough weight to pull it off and the timing couldn't have been more perfect.

Crypto is dead. The thought of it sets off a million alarms inside my head.

All of us who are brave enough to be honest with ourselves have felt pangs of this particular worry throughout this, very peculiar and exhausting, market cycle.

Now let’s move beyond the “shock and awe” of that title and dig into the crux of it all.

The author, a long-time crypto industry insider, declares that “crypto is dead”, not so much in the sense of prices crashing or blockchains going offline, but as a self-contained world centered around crypto natives. The culture and playbook that dominated the space during past cycles (ICO booms, DeFi summer, NFT mania, points farming, liquidity mining, and closed-loop token incentives) was built almost entirely for people whose financial life was already on-chain.

This created an extremely liquid but capped ecosystem, essentially a giant multiplayer game for a tiny, recycling cluster of sophisticated wallets. Over time, the assumption that the rest of the world would eventually become like this niche group has proven false, and continuing to build only for crypto natives now leads to a permanent ceiling.

What is actually dying is crypto as a separate industry, identity, and category. The sharp distinction between “crypto” and fintech, payments, AI infrastructure, or traditional markets is dissolving. Successful adoption is going to look boring: blockchains become invisible backend rails for settlement, cross-border payments, identity, and ownership.

The world will benefit from faster, cheaper, programmable money. For example, Polymarket bettors, global merchants settling in USDT, inflation-hedged savers holding USDC, without ever learning crypto jargon or adopting the culture. Calling something “Web3” or “on-chain” will soon be seen as baggage rather than a selling point; the technology wins precisely when it’s integrated invisibly and no one needs to call themselves a “crypto user” anymore, just as no one today brags about “using the internet” or “using cloud.”

DeLuca remains deeply bullish (and I agree with this point of view) arguing this crypto death is, essentially, just the price of true victory. The old playbook (points, airdrops, mercenary farming) is running out of oxygen, and winners will be those who treat blockchain as an implementation detail for real-world problems rather than some identity. Speculation and crypto-native culture won’t disappear. The casino will persist and keep funding infrastructure but it will become just one player amongst many. Builders, investors, and crypto-OGs who cling to the bunker mentality of “the world must become like us” will be left behind, while those who smuggle permissionlessness, composability, and global liquidity into mainstream products will capture the massive, enduring upside.

Crypto, as we’ve known, loved, and at times despised it, must die so its best ideas can live everywhere and be assimilated into the background of our daily lives.

Deluca’s closing question to everyone still building or investing is pretty profound. It goes something like this, Are you solving problems for crypto natives, or are you solving them for everybody else? Your answer decides whether you’re writing the obituary… or the next chapter.

So, long story short—crypto isn’t really dead. The Trojan Horse has entered the gate. In some small way we all will, indeed, become Satoshi—even if we don't necessarily realize it.

All for now. Thanks so much for reading.

---

www.ericvancewalton.net