You are welcome to explain why - I literally quoted word for word large parts of it and none of it points in other directions.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You are welcome to explain why - I literally quoted word for word large parts of it and none of it points in other directions.
You;re welcome to actually read data... and not ingore so much other data....
Cherry picking you mean....
Lets ingore Springers past of publishing fake papers (not actually paying attention to a huge degree)..
The very research you spin for an antivaxx agenda even says vaccines (even for covid) are important... and points that the vaccine shouldnt be the sole route of dealing with covid. Then there is all the other data that shows that vaccines do help fight against surges, ignroes various othr factors, etc. Due dilegence is something you are repsonsible doing not commenters. I've seen your other posts, dont pretend you care about science. I mean really "in the last 7 days "..... Thats the time frame of the data. Wow...great work..
When you can respond with substance, we can discuss your ideas.
When you can stop pushing tin hattery... I dont owe more "substance" when you don't care about facts and science in the first place and cherry pick, misquote, spread disinfo. I also pointed out issues already that you are welcome to actually deal with. I dont need to do your research, but you should actually do legit research and stop spreading disinfo while you pretend you should be offering medical advice. ANYONE who gets medical advice from you are anyother social media pundit needs to get a grip. But hey, you found two pages that dont even take into consideration the many factors also involved in the very issue it tries to dicuss. But hey, you got a faulty study...sorry, another faulty study to scapegoat and give yourself an excuse ...
To be very clear, this data says to get vaccinated. If you actually read the entire thing.And to wash your fucking hands, social distance, etc. It is very clear that vaccines work against covid deaths and severe hospitalization. Its like vaccines work and this study doesnt take enough data into consideration in the first place.
Dr Peter Mccullough isn't anti vax, he's actually pro vaccine, even says he has nothing against these vaccines, they work for a lot of people....what he does have a problem with is the short amount of time spent on studies and the one shoe fits all approach to mass vaccination. They are ignoring an incredible amount of deaths linked to these vaccines. There isn't a medicine on the market, over the counter or behind the counter that doesn't come with a warning label as to why they shouldn't be taken by certain people. What he argues is we've done reach the threshold, actually gone way beyond the threshold required to have a medicine pulled off the market. Many medicines have been pulled for much less. They need to pull the vaccines and get their ducks in a row first. They need to determine which parts of the global population is okay to have these vaccines and which parts of the population will suffer harm and death from these vaccines. The quota to pull has been met plus some, it's time to stop the carnage going on.
The paper that is being represented is not by this person. S. V. Subramaniancorresponding and Akhil Kumar wrote it. Never said they were antivaxx. I see nothing that shows me this OP was written by a doctor or this person. They have determined long ago the % at risk, which is extremely small. Maybe look for the data.... instead of grasping the question without actually learning. The OP is clearly antivax and time and time again shows it in their account. Vaccines will stop this "carnage". Thats the point. Anyone saying "im not antivaxx" and they push antivaxx conspiracies/disinfo, like how you think we dont know the risks and the % of said risks are low. As for McCullough, he literally that, pretend he isnt against vaccines then pushes false infomation and bullshit remedies, like hydroxychlorquine. Saying he isnt antivaxx is liek saying some one isnt racist but then pushes some racist theories.
https://factcheck.afp.com/us-cardiologist-makes-false-claims-about-covid-19-vaccination
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/vaccines-are-a-safer-alternative-for-acquiring-immunity-compared-to-natural-infection-and-covid-19-survivors-benefit-from-getting-vaccinated-contrary-to-claims-by-peter-mccullough/
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/07/right-wing-vaccine-rebellion-on-campus
https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/vaccines-remain-largely-effective-against-delta-variant-counter-to-claims-from-fox-news-guest/
Just a sample of how he misleads and spread dangerous disinfo.
McCullough is a hack. He fired for spreading the disinfo he has spread. Vaccines are safe. If you feel unsure maybe go speak with an actual professional on the subject? McCullough being a doctor of one thing wouldnt even make him an expert in the subject, plus all the many times he has show to push half assed research and up right falsities. Alt facts arent facts.
The ducks are in a row just fine.
What they are peddling simply isn't true. There's no way you can explain away a higher death rate this year with a vaccine than last year without having a vaccine. Common sense kicks in at some point. You simply can't vaccinated the whole global population in a one shoe fits all fashion, medicine doesn't work like that.