Higher Ceiling or Deeper Hole

in LeoFinance10 months ago

Crisis averted.

The US has raised its debt ceiling by some four trillion dollars so that it can borrow some more money to pay off the repayments for the money they previously borrowed, to pay off the obligations for the money they had borrowed earlier. Now, that this is covered for the time being, they can go and spend more using debt from the future until 2025, when they can borrow more to pay off this borrowing, and the borrowing from earlier.

What a robust, healthy economy,

image.png

I get the difficulty though, as after all, I struggle at times to make ends meet too. As do probably most of us in this world. A national economy is complex and the US economy is the largest in the world. Managing economies are a bit like flying long distances, a degree off in the wrong direction at the start, means never reaching the final destination - and along the way, there are all sorts of obstacles that need to be negotiated, with each pull on the lever being a bit off too.

Everyone was packed for the beach, but ended up crashing into a snow-covered mountain.

And, the levers only control part of the plane, with other forces at play trying to take it in another direction to a place they want to go. Fiscal policy is built on mechanisms that are increasingly less suitable to deal with the economic world, because they can only affect what they have access to. A global economy filled with corporate conglomerates using tricky accounting to ensure that they never pay their full tax obligation anywhere in the world, means that while profits are high for investors, large amounts are being taken from citizens and pushed into financial black holes and used in investment mechanisms that increase gaps between the wealthy and the poor.

But, the governments aren't too concerned about closing all of these loop holes, as after all, they are incentivized to keep them open by the corporations, and their own returns for their interest groups, investor friends, and personal portfolios. Balancing the books is the last thing they really care about, because their main goal is to get reelected to keep the con running a bit longer, before being ousted by a group who will promise to drain the swamp, and then filling it with their own brand of sludge.

Rinse and repeat.

At some point, I guess we will wake up to the conclusion that trying to control an increasingly complex system from a centralized point is always going to fail, as the core can never have perfect enough information to ensure that the right resources, are in the right places, at the right time. This is partially due to basic logistical issues, but mostly due to the fact that humans are bloody poor at this kind of complexity, not to mention, selfish, greedy and competitive. While we are designed to be cooperative, collaborative and social, we don't scale.

Centralization is like having a hundred people wanting to see a movie, but having to decide on which one to go to out of a choice of ten. A centralized authority can make the decision, but only some people will get what they want, with the majority forced to watch what they would rather not. If there are ten cinemas however, then the movies have to compete against each other for the attention of individuals and those that no one wants to go to, will have empty theaters. This is fine for films and their respective production companies, because there are many of them and the failure of one company, isn't the failure of the entire industry - but this isn't suitable for economies that will affect everyone within its bounds, and its bounds are everyone.

This is a big part of the reason that decentralized governance and economies are the future, because they are able to meet local needs, and compete in financial tribes in a way that will protect them from centralization, because monopolization is much harder. This is because if any one gets "too big and abusive" the consumer group will adjust to use others instead. Currently, people are forced into using the consolidated offerings, because they are dictated by the central authority.

Too big to fail.

This is often posited as a type of hubris, where an organization or institution is considered so powerful, it can't fail. But, it is more that it is so big that it isn't allowed to fail, because if it does, it is going to have massive repercussions for the rest of the economy, so it can be poorly managed and still be given protection. The US economy is much like this, where no matter how poorly it behaves, it is continually forgiven because to not do so, will see a global financial tantrum. And, the more it is protected, the bigger dick it becomes, like a spoilt child who feels it is entitled to whatever it wants, that grows into an asshole adult.

No, it isn't easy to manage a large economy, but this is also why it is folly to even try to do it from a centralized position, because it isn't centralized. There is a free market of operators in the system that are constantly trying to maximize themselves, but the majority of the participants are beholden to the centralized authority that pretends it has control of it all. It doesn't, but through a process of smoke, mirrors and the threat of incarceration - we are prisoners.

The comforting fact however is that all centralized structures fail, all of them. Every single one of them in the past has collapsed and into the future, they are going to collapse too. But, this isn't exactly cause for celebration because the collapse is a lot like the sun dying, the rest of what we know dies with it too. However, life is persistent and small pockets can find a way to survive and start again.

It would be far better for all involved if rather than pushing a centralized economy to the point of collapse, we instead found healthier ways to organize ourselves so that we are able to better suit our needs as a global society. The problem goes back to us being selfish, greedy and competitive however, with incentives that reward bad behavior, over improved wellbeing.

There will be another crisis. And another. And another.

The question is, is the ceiling raising, or is the hole getting deeper?

Taraz
[ Gen1: Hive ]

Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha

Sort:  

Both, I suppose.

But whether we are pushing for the failure of the old system or hoping it will continue, strikes me the prudent thing is to worry more about building and using the viable alternative now so we can at least enjoy somewhat of a soft landing.

But there's a mindset challenge there... people have grown accustomed to dependency rather than self-reliance... which is core to decentralization.

But still, prepare. To use a different metaphor, if you are "pretty sure" government pension schemes will fail before you retire, start saving elsewhere. If they do survive, you will not only have lost nothing, you will be getting a bigger pension; if they fail, you'll still get some retirement benefits!

=^..^=

prudent thing is to worry more about building and using the viable alternative now so we can at least enjoy somewhat of a soft landing.

Yep, I agree. With all the faults crypto has, at least it is an attempt at better. Everyone else seems to be trying to flog a dead horse.

Say again, please. I couldn't hear you over the American music in the background.

Protest music?

Nah.. It was either that or something anti Finland but I've never been there. = }

or something anti Finland

I am guessing it would have to be a Russian song! :D

As long as we can avoid stagflation, then there should be a way out. But adding more debt to service old debt is a path to destruction and there is no coming back from that without blowing the whole system up. Maybe it is time for a "Fight Club" style movement to take out the entire centralized credit system and put us all back to square one.

Maybe it is time for a "Fight Club" style movement to take out the entire centralized credit system and put us all back to square one.

The first rule?

I'm not worried about the first rule... I'm worried about blowing up all the records of personal debt held by credit card companies. =)

You mean like how they did it to E Corp in Mr Robot? :D

Not familiar with Mr Robot 🤷‍♂️

:O Mr Robot has Rami Malek in it. One of the best tv shows in my opinion. Not sure where it's streaming in the US, but I have all 4 seasons on my computer :D

Freddie Mercury is a Robot?! neat.

A global EMP

Would be bad for Splinterlands yeah? Hrrrmmm hehehehe. Save the Blockchains!

That thing with the theaters is a really great way of explaining decentralization. You would think it should be pretty obvious by now, but clearly some people are still struggling with it. It will be interesting to see where we go from here. Likely just more sideways stuff. This was a small bump on the road to the next bull I guess.

This was a small bump on the road to the next bull I guess.

Yep. I think so. I am looking forward (like everyone) to the next bullrun, but in the meantime, it is interesting to see how screwed up the entire system is.

Economy of the world is disturb since last year but here in our country there's a biggest crash in economy and i think no one can stop it from crashing again, and with that we're facing high inflation here too

The global economy is a mess, but don't worry, the people who made the mess will be fine.

The "too big to fail" is something true, until they fail. And when it happens, unforeseen and unimaginable events start to happen.

Like one of my former teammate said: "the bigger they are, the more noise they make when falling"

And they all fail eventually - the biggest companies, nations, species...

The shit storm is coming eventually. I believe it is coming sooner rather than later. It is going to be a sad affair for many and I do not look forward to the chaos it will bring. However, I am not so worried about me, financially I think I will be fine. I am more worried about my sons and their future.

and I do not look forward to the chaos it will bring.

Me either. I would far prefer an easy life - but where we are headed, even without a collapse of the economy, isn't easy for the majority of us.

I am more worried about my sons and their future.

Yep. It is really hard to come to terms with, that my daughter might not have much opportunity at all, even if she is intelligent, balanced and motivated.

It seems we will be working to meet just our biological needs in the near future. No social activities, no travel, no joy...

All for survival. We are going backwards in our species' development, aren't we?

Right, even in terms of protein.

The only thing I don't understand is what is shown in this photo?

I am glad you asked. It is a Gin Tonic :)

To me ,it is the both , the ceiling is raising and the hole is getting deeper , this is my view.thank for sharing

I think the hole is getting deeper. They just keep spending and enriching themselves/friends at the expense of the average person. I just don't see how things will be solved in the future when they keep doing that.

Haha deeper hole? Sometimes I wonder why the debt ceiling is there in the first place. It seems that they will always extend even though to be fair, there are some checks and balances like voting in Senate and Congress and the negotiations. Without this ceiling, maybe it would just cause less "worry" or "panic" in the markets.

Who would have thought, the highest well economy country, will be crumbling on their feet, i guess US is still having a difficult time getting up. well i hope they recover pretty soon. I got friends complaining about the hardship there especially non citizens.