Good feedback! Personally, I think this is mostly making HIVE seem unappealing. "Stake it, and spend a lot of time curating, or else you'll lose money!" I would rather make the positive arguments for how it gives stakers the opportunity to earn while helping shape new and more profitable dApps and Communities.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm curious as to why attracting simple, basic, consumption (which is something literally everyone on the internet does, on their own time, for free, yet they're dishing out a lot of money at times, while their online footprint is traced, tracked, logged, then exploited) is converted into:
Then shunned. In an attention economy. Where people for many years have complained their work is not viewed, they lack support, comment sections are quiet, and so on (very valid concerns). But people want more:
That on their own don't stand a chance of being successful without, people. Sure one can pump all kinds of money into it... but then what?
I'm just curious. There must be some reason. I'd like to know what I'm missing.
I think the 3.0 are already in. The investors care about money, fomo and defi === automation of yield.
But I must admit I stoped trying to convince people about Hive. Same as I stopped "selling" bitcoin and ethereum yeras ago.
I do mention it once in a while so when they will join they won't say: "why didn't you tell me". But thats it. No sweat. If it works (and it does) they will come.